ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

The Effect of Newspaper Reporting on COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: a Randomised Controlled Trial (COVANEW)

U

University of Bari Aldo Moro

Status

Completed

Conditions

Vaccine Hesitancy

Treatments

Other: abstract vs concrete texts

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy can be observed at different rates in different countries. 1,068 people were surveyed in France and Italy to inquire about individual potential acceptance, focusing on time preferences, in a risk-return framework: having the vaccination today, in a month, and in 3 months; perceived risks of vaccination and COVID-19; and expected benefit of the vaccine. A randomized controlled trial was conducted to understand how everyday stimuli, such as fact-based news about vaccines, impact on audience acceptance of vaccination. The main experiment involved two groups of participants and two different articles about vaccine-related thrombosis taken from two Italian newspapers. One article used a more abstract description and language, and the other used a more anecdotical description and concrete language; each group read only one of these articles. Two other groups were assigned categorization tasks; one was asked to complete a concrete categorization task and the other an abstract categorization task.

Full description

The goal of this RCT is to learn how journalistic news can affect vaccine hesitancy. 2 cohorts of unvaccinated individual, one Italian, one French. 5 arms design:

  1. participants reading a fact-based newspaper article written in an abstract language
  2. participants reading a fact-based newspaper article written in a more concrete language
  3. participants performing abstract categorization task
  4. participants performing concrete categorization task
  5. control group answering questionnaire

Research questions:

i) Does a more abstract vs concrete language increase the willingness to receive the vaccine? ii) Does a more abstract vs concrete mindset increase the willingness to receive the vaccine? iii) Is a gender effect detectable?

Enrollment

1,068 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 64 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

unvaccinated individuals

Exclusion criteria

vaccinated individuals

Trial design

Primary purpose

Other

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

1,068 participants in 5 patient groups

concrete text
Other group
Description:
Italian and French unvaccinated cohorts (n= 164; n=163)
Treatment:
Other: abstract vs concrete texts
abstract text
Other group
Description:
Italian and French unvaccinated cohorts (n=155; n=153)
Treatment:
Other: abstract vs concrete texts
abstract task
Other group
Description:
Italian and French unvaccinated cohorts (n=54; n=55)
Treatment:
Other: abstract vs concrete texts
concrete task
Other group
Description:
Italian and French unvaccinated cohorts (n=55; n=56)
Treatment:
Other: abstract vs concrete texts
control
Other group
Description:
Italian and French unvaccinated cohorts (n=103; n=110)
Treatment:
Other: abstract vs concrete texts

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems