ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

The Effect of Sealer Type and Obturation Technique on Postoperative Pain (pain)

J

Jordan University of Science and Technology

Status

Completed

Conditions

Dental Pulp Necrosis

Treatments

Procedure: Obturation of root canals

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07386197
313/2021
Deanship of Research (Other Identifier)

Details and patient eligibility

About

Postoperative pain is an important consideration in endodontic treatment, and its incidence may be influenced by both obturation technique and sealer type. This study focused on molars to minimize anatomical variability and provide a consistent assessment of pain associated with different endodontic protocols.

This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and level of postoperative pain in molars treated with root canal therapy, in relation to the type of sealer and obturation technique used.

Full description

One hundred and twenty patients (aged 18-60 years; 63 males, 57 females) requiring root canal treatment of mandibular or maxillary molars will be included. Only teeth with necrotic pulp and asymptomatic apical periodontitis or previously extirpated pulp are considered. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of four groups (30 patients each): Group A-AH Plus resin sealer with cold lateral compaction (AH-CLC); Group B-AH Plus with warm vertical compaction (AH-WVC); Group C-TotalFill bioceramic sealer with single-cone technique (TF-SC); Group D-TotalFill HiFlow with warm vertical compaction (TF-WVC). Postoperative pain will be self-recorded using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) at 6 hours, 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, and 1 week after treatment. Completed forms will be collected when patients returned for permanent coronal restoration. Analgesic use was also recorded. Data will analyzed using one way ANOVA and Chi square tests.

Enrollment

120 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 60 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. both male and female patients within
  2. The age of 18-60 years old who required root canal treatment
  3. Either mandibular or maxillary molars with the diagnosis of either; necrotic pulp with asymptomatic apical periodontitis,
  4. Teeth with pulp extirpated ( previously initiated root canal treatment) regardless of the periapical status

Exclusion criteria

  1. Teeth diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis;
  2. Teeth with intracanal abberations or mishaps such as perforations, transportation, severe ledging , broken instruments, apical resorption or open apices;
  3. Teeth requiring posts;
  4. Any patient on long term steroid or any other medical condition that requires long term analgesic.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

120 participants in 4 patient groups

AH Plus resin sealer with cold lateral compaction
Active Comparator group
Description:
Obturation using cold lateral condensation and resin sealer
Treatment:
Procedure: Obturation of root canals
AH Plus with warm vertical compaction
Active Comparator group
Description:
Obturation using warm vertical compaction and resin sealer
Treatment:
Procedure: Obturation of root canals
TotalFill bioceramic sealer with single-cone technique
Active Comparator group
Description:
Obturation with single cone and bioceramic sealer
Treatment:
Procedure: Obturation of root canals
TotalFill HiFlow with warm vertical compaction
Active Comparator group
Description:
Obturation with warm vertical compaction and bioceramic sealer
Treatment:
Procedure: Obturation of root canals

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems