ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

The Effectiveness and Safety of Low-intensity Single-wavelength Red Light in Controlling High Myopia in Children and Adolescents:A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial

S

Shanghai Eye Disease Prevention and Treatment Center

Status

Completed

Conditions

The Guardian Voluntarily Signed the Subject's Informed Consent Form
Clinical Diagnosis Confirming That Myopia Has Occurred in at Least One Eye
Age 3 to 16 Years (Inclusive), Male or Female

Treatments

Other: Eyesing Redlight Instrument

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05184621
ShanghaiEye

Details and patient eligibility

About

Objective: To study the effectiveness and safety of low-intensity single wavelength red light in controlling high myopia in children and adolescents.

Methods: Subject population: Children aged 3-16 years who have high myopia. Sample size: 190 subjects were planned to be enrolled and assigned to the test or control group in a 1:1 ratio.

Full description

Design: The trial was a randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial. A total of 190 children aged 3-16 years with high myopia were selected and divided into 95 cases in the test group and 95 cases in the control group. The test group was treated with the Eyesing Instrument developed by Suzhou Industrial Park Zoguan Medical Equipment Co. and conventional optometry. The safety and efficacy of the low-energy laser device in the test group were evaluated by comparing the changes in myopia between the two groups during the observation period. Subjects were screened after signing the informed consent form (performed as early as 7 days before the randomization), and the examination used for screening could use the results of eye examinations performed within 1 week at our hospital, and they were enrolled after confirming that they met the inclusion criteria. On the same day, the grouping was done by randomization, and the glasses were prescribed or the glasses were prescribed in combination with the device according to the grouping results. Visits were performed at 30± 14 days, 90± 14 days, 180± 14 days, 270± 14 days, and 365± 14 days

Enrollment

192 patients

Sex

All

Ages

3 to 16 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. age 3 to 16 years (inclusive), male or female

  2. clinical diagnosis confirming that myopia has occurred in at least one eye.

  3. the guardian voluntarily signed the "Subject's Informed Consent Form"

    Exclusion Criteria:

    • history of photosensitivity, glaucoma, glaucoma syndrome, high intraocular pressure, macular lesion or injury in the fundus ② corneal curvature examination, the average K value of the anterior surface of the cornea ≥ 45; ③ combined with heart, liver, kidney and other systemic diseases and prior.

      • Combination of cardiac, hepatic, renal, and other systemic diseases and congenital myopia; ④ Combination of ocular trauma and congenital myopia.

        ④ Combined with ocular trauma and chronic ocular diseases such as apparently oblique or operated eyes, atopic keratoconjunctivitis, etc.; ⑤ Previous presence of entropion.

        ⑤ Those with previous entropion and other eye diseases such as severe corneal and conjunctival infections; ⑥ Those with combined neurological diseases and other eye diseases.

        (6) Those with combined neurological disorders and allergies or contraindications to atropine drugs or other therapeutic drugs; (7) Albinism and psoriasis.

        (7) Patients with albinism, psoriasis, nephrotic syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, diabetes mellitus, and other immune system and systemic diseases; (8) Epilepsy, psychiatric disorders.

        ⑧ epilepsy, mental disorders who cannot communicate normally.

        • Previously treated with other treatments to control the development of myopia such as anticholinergic drugs such as atropine within 3 months, or involved in other functional
        • Previously treated with other treatments to control the development of myopia, such as anticholinergic drugs like atropine within 3 months, or involved in other studies related to functional frame lenses, multifocal soft lenses, etc.

    Other conditions judged by the investigator to be unsuitable for participation in the study

Trial design

Primary purpose

Prevention

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Triple Blind

192 participants in 2 patient groups

efficacy
Active Comparator group
Description:
Including Primary outcome: changes in axial length of the eye. Secondary outcome: Equivalent spherical lens variation Other indicators: ① Changes in visual acuity with lenses, corrected visual acuity, and intraocular pressure.② Observation of changes in corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, ciliary body thickness, and crystal thickness.Observation of fundus tissue structure of macula and peri-optic disc area. Observation of fundus choroidal/retinal thickness.Adherence index: frequency of device use.
Treatment:
Other: Eyesing Redlight Instrument
safety
Active Comparator group
Description:
Description of safety parameters: Adverse events, device defects during the test. Method and time selection for evaluation, recording, and analysis of safety parameters. Adverse events and device defects were recorded from the beginning of each subject's enrollment to the end of the group for evaluation. Safety indicators:① Incidence of allergic reactions.② Posterior image time more than 5 minutes.③ The decrease of near vision.④ The grade of side effects such as self-induced photophobia and blurred vision.⑤ Elevated intraocular pressure, headache, nausea, and vomiting, etc.
Treatment:
Other: Eyesing Redlight Instrument

Trial documents
2

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Yan Xu, advanced

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems