ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

The Effectiveness of Adhesive Versus Conventional Nasoalveolar Molding on Children With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

A

Al-Azhar University

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

Cleft Lip and Palate

Treatments

Device: Nasoalveolar molding in unilateral cleft lip and palate

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06451276
NAM in unilateral cleft

Details and patient eligibility

About

The present study will compare the effectiveness of adhesive nasoalveolar molding (GS-NAM) and conventional nasoalveolar molding on the alveolar ridge, nasal, and labial growth in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

objectives: -

  1. Evaluation of the anatomical position of the greater and lesser segments of the maxilla related to a stable midline anatomical point.
  2. Evaluation of the nasal symmetry.

Full description

cleft lip and palate can manifest as an independent anomaly, be associated with a syndrome, or present as a complex condition. Unilateral clefts are notably more common, occurring nine times more frequently than bilateral clefts. Additionally, it predominantly affects males, with a male-to-female ratio of 2:1. Common clinical features in unilateral cleft lip and palate cases involve structural changes in the nose, lip, palate, and alveolar arch. Peri-oral tissues lack continuity, and on the affected side of the nose, you can observe wider nostrils and a downward-pointing alar rim. Additionally, the columella and nasal tip shift towards the unaffected or normal side, accompanied by the displacement of the maxillary alveolar segments towards the lateral side.

Conventional treatment for cleft lip and palate historically comprised numerous surgical procedures, including secondary revisions and alveolar bone grafting. However, even with these multiple interventions, concerns persisted regarding suboptimal aesthetics. Therefore, the pursuit of non-surgical treatment options that can mitigate the severity of this deformity during early life is greatly desirable. The introduction of the presurgical Nasoalveolar molding (NAM) procedure has offered an alternative, allowing for the avoidance of traditional secondary surgeries while achieving improved outcomes. . These interventions should be initiated within the narrow time frame from birth to four months, as estrogen levels decrease within the first four months after birth, making this period optimal for tissue manipulation.

Enrollment

30 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

7 days to 12 weeks old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age: 1- 8 weeks.
  • Gender: male and female.
  • Patients with a unilateral cleft alveolus and lip.
  • No developmental syndromes or atypical cleft pathology in medical history.
  • No previous history of unilateral CLP correction.
  • Motivated parents toward the treatment.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with a bilateral cleft alveolus and lip
  • Syndromic patient
  • Uncooperative caregiver

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

30 participants in 3 patient groups

Adhesive nasoalveolar molding (GS-NAM)
Active Comparator group
Description:
3D (3 dimensional ) printed conventional NAM in thickness of 2 mm. The cleft area will be blocked in software, and NAM will be fabricated using a 3D (3 dimensional ) printer. Soft acrylic resin will be added to make pressure area and reduction in opposing for relief. The appliance will be evaluated and adjusted monthly. A nasal stent will be fabricated when the cleft is 5mm
Treatment:
Device: Nasoalveolar molding in unilateral cleft lip and palate
Conventional nasoalveolar molding
Experimental group
Description:
(positive control group) comprises 10 cases of unilateral cleft lip and palate that will be scheduled for construction of 3D (3 dimensional ) printed conventional NAM in thickness of 2 mm. The cleft area will be blocked in software, and NAM will be fabricated using a 3D printer. Soft acrylic resin will be added to make pressure area and reduction in opposing for relief. The appliance will be evaluated and adjusted monthly. A nasal stent will be fabricated when the cleft is 5mm
Treatment:
Device: Nasoalveolar molding in unilateral cleft lip and palate
normal children
No Intervention group
Description:
normal children which will be compared with groups 1 and 2 for results evaluation

Trial contacts and locations

2

Loading...

Central trial contact

Ahmed F Ahmed, Master; Adel F Hassan, Phd

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems