ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

The Effects of Action Observation and Motor Imagery on Students' Ability to Locate Anatomical Locations: A Randomised Control Trial

T

Teesside University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Action Observation
Motor Imagery

Treatments

Other: Motor Imagery
Other: Traditional Teaching
Other: Action Observation

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06043219
TeessideU23

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of this investigation is to measure if additional pedagogical techniques (Action Observation and Motor Imagery) improve student's ability to identify anatomical structures compared to traditional teaching techniques.

Full description

The aim of this investigation is to measure if additional pedagogical techniques (Action Observation and Motor Imagery) improve student's ability to identify anatomical structures compared to traditional teaching techniques. Action observation is defined as watching human movement either via a pre-recorded video or a live demonstration. Motor imagery is defined as the mental representation of human movement, including its sensory and motor aspects, without physically executing the action. For example, imagining the feeling and effort of moving your upper-limb to reach out and grasp a glass of water from on top of a table. Motor imagery practice is defined as the structured engagement in motor imagery over time for the purpose of acquiring and enhancing motor skills.

Traditional teaching of anatomy using a common powerpoint based method, will be compared to the traditional powerpoint method plus the addition of action observation techniques or action observation and motor imagery techniques. The investigation, will also look at whether these interventions have an effect on information retention, by retesting the groups at a later date.

Enrollment

33 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 65 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Level 4 (year one) pre-registration Teesside University physiotherapy/Occupational Therapy/Radiography/Sports Rehab students.
  • No previous specific University anatomy training.
  • Willing to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Non Teesside University students
  • Healthcare students with previous University level anatomy knowledge (including those with past healthcare degrees).
  • Not willing to provide consent.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Health Services Research

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

33 participants in 3 patient groups

Traditional Teaching
Active Comparator group
Description:
Traditional anatomical teaching provided by a powerpoint lecture.
Treatment:
Other: Traditional Teaching
Action Observational
Experimental group
Description:
Traditional anatomical teaching via a recorded powerpoint and additionally receiving practice of the task via action observation.
Treatment:
Other: Action Observation
Other: Traditional Teaching
Action Observational and Motor Imagery
Experimental group
Description:
Traditional anatomical teaching via a recorded powerpoint and additionally receiving practice of the task via action observation and at the same time imagine themselves executing the same action
Treatment:
Other: Action Observation
Other: Traditional Teaching
Other: Motor Imagery

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Paul Chesterton, PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems