The Effects of Different Physiotherapy Approaches in Stable COPD Patients.

Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University

Status: Unknown

Conditions: COPD

Treatments: Other: intervention group 2; Other: intervention group 3; Other: Pulmonary Rehabilitation; Other: intervention group 4; Other: intervention group 1

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT05335304

physiotherapy approaches

Details and patient eligibility

About

In our study, the effects of Kinesio Taping (KT), Rigid Taping (RT), Thoracic Mobilization (TM) and Core Stabilization (KS) approaches on respiratory muscle morphology, respiratory muscle strength, exercise capacity and quality of life will be examined in stable COPD patients. Study is designed as prospective, single-blinded, randomized-controlled study.

Full description

The study is planned to compare the effects of different physiotherapy approaches on respiratory muscle morphology, respiratory muscle strength, exercise capacity and quality of life in stable COPD patients over 18 years of age.The study is carried out on 65 patients who applied to Muğla Training and Research Hospital with COPD patients. The patients are divided into 5 groups by randomization method. First group, Kinesio Taping group, inhibitory effect on upper trapezius and scalene muscles, facilitator effect on diaphragm and intercostal muscles will be applied. The second group, Rigid Taping group, inhibitory effect on upper trapezius and scalene muscles, facilitator effect on diaphragm and intercostal muscles will be applied. The third group,Thoracic Mobilization group, Modified Active-Passive Thoracic mobilization will be performed according to the patients' conditions. Thoracic Mobilization techniques will be used to improve thoracic mobility in the upper, middle or lower parts of the chest. The fourth group,In Core Stabilization group, five different trunk stabilization exercises will be performed. Fifth group is the control group and no taping was done. A standard treatment program is applied for the individuals in the whole group. Evaluations is made before and after treatment (3 and 6 weeks). Evaluation parameters is respiratory muscle morphology, respiratory muscle strength, exercise capacity and quality of life.

The respiratory muscle morphology is measured by the radiologist, and all other measurements and treatments were performed by the physiotherapist. Pulmonary function test will be measured using spirometry, respiratory muscle strength using mouth pressure device, functional exercise capacity using 6-minute walk test, quality of life using Leicester Cough Questionnaire, dyspnea using Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale and, symptoms using COPD Assessment Tests.

The data obtain from the research will be analyzed using the SPSS program. Statistical significance level will be accepted as p<0.05. In the statistical difference analysis between groups, one-way ANOVA test will be used for parametric data and Kruskal- Wallis test will be used for non-parametric data.

Enrollment: 65 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18+ years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

1. People with stable COPD,
2. Patients with spirometric measurements of GOLD 2-3 according to the new GOLD classification and A, B according to symptoms and exacerbations
3. To be 18 years or older,
4. No acute exacerbation in the last 3 weeks,
5. Alterations in medical treatment and not using any antibiotics in last 3 weeks,
6. Not being included in the pulmonary rehabilitation program in the last 6 months,
7. Volunteering to participate in study

Exclusion criteria

1. Orthopedic and neuromuscular disorders,
2. Advanced heart failure,
3. Aortic stenosis, deep vein thrombosis, pacemaker,
4. Patients with acute exacerbation of symptoms in the previous three weeks,
5. Those with weak cognitive function will be excluded from the study.
6. Patients who are unable to cooperate will also be considered ineligible.
7. Irritation, infection, allergic reaction, scarred burn or open wound around application area.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

65 participants in 5 patient groups

intervention group 1

Active Comparator group

Description:

Kinesio taping and standard treatment program

Treatment:

Other: intervention group 1

Other: Pulmonary Rehabilitation

intervention group 2

Active Comparator group

Description:

Rigid taping and standard treatment program

Treatment:

Other: Pulmonary Rehabilitation

Other: intervention group 2

intervention group 3

Active Comparator group

Description:

Thoracic Mobilization and standard treatment program

Treatment:

Other: Pulmonary Rehabilitation

Other: intervention group 3

intervention group 4

Active Comparator group

Description:

Core Stabilization and standard treatment program

Treatment:

Other: intervention group 4

Other: Pulmonary Rehabilitation

Control group

Other group

Description:

No intervention, only standard treatment program

Treatment:

Other: Pulmonary Rehabilitation