ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

The Effects of In-phase Bilateral Exercise in People with Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

C

Cyprus University of Technology

Status

Completed

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis, Secondary Progressive
Multiple Sclerosis, Primary Progressive

Treatments

Behavioral: In-phase Bilateral Exercise
Behavioral: Conservative exercises

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. MS, typical presents with progression of clinical symptoms which mainly include motor and cognitive impairment, as well as reduction of patients' quality of life. Exercise is an effective approach in the management of the symptoms in people with progressive MS. Previous studies in healthy and in people with MS, reported a close relationship between cognitive functions and upper limb performance. Since patients with progressive MS facing difficulties with performing complex exercises due to cognitive dysfunctions and given the close relationship between cognitive functions and manual dexterity, a reasonable question arises whether a type of upper limbs exercises with less cognitive demands will improve the information processing speed in people with progressive MS. The aim of the current study is to investigate the effects of in-phase bilateral upper limbs exercises on the information processing speed, in patients with progressive MS, given that in-phase bilateral movements needs less attentional load than the other types of bilateral coordination. The intervention protocol lasted for 12 consecutive weeks (30-60 minutes /session x 3 sessions/week) and included in-phase bilateral exercises of the upper limbs, adapted to different sports activities and to functional training. Results from the statistical analysis indicated improvement of the experimental group compared to the control group, on the information processing speed alongside with improvement of motor skills.

Full description

The term progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) includes both secondary progressive MS (SPMS) and primary progressive MS (PPMS). As it is well known, the course of MS is highly variable. On one hand, almost 50% of the patients who is characterized by the relapsing remitting MS, after 10-15 years of disease this pattern becomes progressive, in which individual clinical symptoms slowly progress, a disease type defined as a SPMS. On the other hand, in about 15% of people with MS, disease progression is persistent from onset defined as a PPMS. Patients with progressive MS except from physical impairment, often have cognitive dysfunctions, which negatively affect quality of life. Information processing speed is the most common cognitive deficit, between people with PPMS and those with SPMS.

Despite the fact that cognitive rehabilitation approaches are effective in treating MS-related cognitive dysfunctions, there are evidence from several studies which indicated the impact of different types of exercises in the improvement of cognitive in people with MS. Furthermore, evidences from previous studies in healthy and people with MS, reported a close relationship between cognitive functions and upper limbs performance, defined by the projections from the Anterior Cingulate Cortex to the motor cortex and spinal cord. Specifically, the decline of information processing speed indicates reduction of manual dexterity in people with MS. Manual dexterity is defined as the manual skill which contains coordination of fine and gross voluntary movements of the upper limbs. Manual dexterity dysfunction in MS contributes to reduced ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) and social activities, which causes reduction of independency and quality of life.

Moreover, evidence from previous studies, reported that in-phase bilateral movements needs less attentional load and less neural control than the unilateral or the other types of bilateral coordination, as a result to perform the specific type of movement (i.e., in-phase bilateral) more efficient and more easy. Therefore, given that patients with progressive MS characterized by decline of information processing speed, which affects manual dexterity, a reasonable question arises whether in-phase bilateral upper limbs exercises will improve information processing speed and thus, to improve manual dexterity in the specific clinical cohort.

The aim of the current study was to investigate primarily the hypothesis that a 12-week exercise program based on in-phase bilateral upper limbs movements, based on sport activities and functional training, could improve information processing speed compared to a conservative type of exercise, in people with progressive MS. A secondary aim was to evaluate whether the specific exercise program could improve manual dexterity and have a correlation with information processing speed.

Second aim of the study was to investigate the effects of the specific type of exercises on various clinical symptoms, fatigue and on quality of life, using clinical assessment tools and subjective questionnaires.

Enrollment

20 patients

Sex

All

Ages

30 to 70 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • diagnosis of progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) (primary or/and secondary progressive MS)
  • Expanded Disability Status Scale score between three and six
  • no relapse within 30 days
  • aged between 30 and 70 years
  • Mini Mental State of Examination score between 20 and 30 (mild to no cognitive impairment)

Exclusion criteria

  • history of any disease affecting the central nervous system other than MS (e.g., stroke, Parkinson's disease, cerebral palsy)
  • history of cardiovascular disease (e.g., known aneurism, myocardial infarction, hyper/hypotension, heart failure)
  • severe orthopaedic disorders (e.g., knee or hip replacement, spondylosurgery, disk herniation, recent bone fracture)
  • mental disorders (e.g., depression, schizophrenia, bipolar syndrome)
  • pregnancy during the implementation of the study timeline
  • hearing impairments (i.e., deafness)
  • visual deficit (e.g., optic neuritis, blindness, diplopia, glaucoma, blurred vision)
  • history of epileptic seizures
  • spasticity level on upper or lower limbs more than 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone) according to Modified Ashworth Scale

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Triple Blind

20 participants in 2 patient groups

IBPMS
Experimental group
Description:
The exercise program of the experimental group consisted of exercises based on in-phase bilateral movements of the upper and lower limbs, which they were adapted to different sport activities and to fitness functional exercises. The specific exercise program was organized in a group circuit training, performed simultaneously on each session from all the participants of the experimental group, considering the MS exercise recommendations. Specifically, the program included sports activities of basic technical skills of basketball (e.g., different types of passing, catching and throwing the ball) and volleyball (e.g., different types of passing and receiving the ball), whereas the fitness exercises included the diagonal movements from proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation technique, by the use of a resistance bands.
Treatment:
Behavioral: In-phase Bilateral Exercise
Controls
Active Comparator group
Description:
The participants of the active control group, underwent an exercise program based on conventional exercises, such as strengthening of the major muscle groups of the trunk, resistance exercises for the upper and lower limbs and body weight support treadmill exercise. All participants of the active control group performed the specific types of exercises individually, as opposed with the experimental group which was organized as a group training. Controls performed the specific type exercises once a week, for 12 consecutive weeks.
Treatment:
Behavioral: Conservative exercises

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems