ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

The Effects of Knee Extension Constraint Rehabilitation After ACL Reconstruction

P

Peking University

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Treatments

Other: No Intervention
Device: brace1
Device: brace2

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

To develop new prevention programs for non-contact ACL injuries that do not require additional training time and assistance from a sports medicine professional personnel. A knee extension constraint will be utilized to patients who have undertaken ACL reconstruction.

And to determine the effects of knee extension constraint rehabilitation on lower extremity biomechanics after ACL reconstruction surgery.

Full description

Purpose Of exploring the biomechanical effect of knee extension constraint rehabilitation on rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods: Recruit 60 patients after ACL reconstruction. Divide them into three groups by random block method: Knee extension constraint rehabilitation group (wearing a brace with limitation of knee extension), Placebo group (wearing a brace without limitation of knee extension), and Control group (no brace is worn). The three groups of patients received the same rehabilitation training from 1 to 12 weeks after surgery, starting from week 13 and intervening on the first day of each week (wearing braces). Five tests were performed at the end of the 12th, 24th, 36th, and 48th weeks after surgery. Vicon system and force platform system will be synchronized used to test walking, jogging, side-cutting, and jumping; The Isokinetic dynamometer system will be used to test muscle strength. Outcome evaluation indicators and statistical methods: (1) Mixed design two-way analysis of variances will be used for the following indicators: approach run velocity and jump height; knee flexion angle at initial foot contact with the ground; knee extension moment at the time of peak impact poster ground reaction force, study group will be considered as an independent variable while testing time as the variable for repeated measurements. (2) The knee flexion, valgus-varus, and internal-external rotation angles, and extension, valgus-varus, and internal-external rotation moments of each leg during support phase of each movement will be expressed as functions of normalized movement time and leg (involved or uninvolved) using regression analysis with dummy variable. A dummy variable will be used to represent involved and uninvolved legs. A forward elimination procedure will be used to determine the best regression equations. The regression procedure will be stopped when the contributions of powers of n+1 and n+2 have no significant contribution to the overall regression. The contribution of the dummy variable in the regression will be an indication of asymmetry of the movements of involved and uninvolved legs. The effect of study group on movement asymmetry will be determined by comparing the contribution of dummy variables to the overall regression among study groups using a one-way ANOVA. The effects of study group and testing time on the ACL injury risk index will be determined for each knee in each movement using two-way ANOVA with mixed model. Study group will be considered as an independent variable while testing time as a repeated measure variable.

Enrollment

60 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 35 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who have isolated ACL injury and receive ACL reconstruction surgery at Sports Medicine Center, 3rd Hospital of Beijing University, Beijing, China.
  • 18-35 years old
  • With isolated ACL injury (an ACL injury with no need for surgical repairs to other knee structures).
  • All participants have no known disorders or diseases other than ACL rupture.

Exclusion criteria

  • Female patients who are pregnant, or suspected pregnant, or in breastfeeding will be excluded from this study.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

60 participants in 3 patient groups

knee extension constraint rehabilitation group
Other group
Treatment:
Device: brace1
placebo group
Other group
Treatment:
Device: brace2
control group
Other group
Treatment:
Other: No Intervention

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Yuanyuan Yu, Bachler

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems