ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

The Effects of Ultrasound-guided PRF Versus DN in Myofascial Pain Patients

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College logo

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

Myofascial Pain

Treatments

Procedure: ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency
Procedure: ultrasound-guided dry needling

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study aims to compare the effects of pulsed radiofrequency and drying needling and explore the short-term effect of pulsed radiofrequency in treating myofascial pain patients.

Enrollment

68 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 70 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-70 years old, gender unlimited.
  • Myofascial pain diagnosed according to the "Simons and Travell" criteria.
  • Able to complete treatment and follow-up.
  • Signed inform consent form.

Exclusion criteria

  • History of surgery, trauma, or infection in the pain area.
  • Severe systemic disease, e.g. malignant tumor; severe hepatic, renal, or coagulation disorder; etc.
  • Pregnancy, needle phobia, unable to cooperate.
  • Concurrently receiving pain treatment in other institutions.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

68 participants in 2 patient groups

PRF-PRF
Experimental group
Treatment:
Procedure: ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency
DN-PRF
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Procedure: ultrasound-guided dry needling

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Central trial contact

Jin Wang

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems