ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

The Efficacy of High-Power Laser Therapy in Meralgia Paresthetica

U

Uşak University

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Meralgia Paresthetica

Treatments

Other: Standard Conservative Care
Other: Sham laser
Device: High-power laser

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07328360
AYK&ES&NS

Details and patient eligibility

About

The management of MP typically follows a conservative pathway, encompassing patient education, lifestyle modifications (e.g., avoidance of tight garments, weight loss), pharmacotherapy (such as neuropathic pain agents or corticosteroid injections), and physical therapy. However, evidence supporting the efficacy of these interventions is largely anecdotal or derived from low-quality studies, and a substantial proportion of patients experience persistent symptoms refractory to standard care.

Therefore, the primary objective of this randomized, sham-controlled, assessor-blinded study is to investigate the efficacy of HPLT as an adjunct to standard conservative care on pain intensity, sensory symptoms, and functional capacity in patients with chronic Meralgia Paresthetica. The investigators hypothesize that patients receiving active HPLT will demonstrate significantly greater improvements in these outcomes compared to those receiving a sham laser procedure

Full description

Meralgia Paresthetica (MP) is a mononeuropathy characterized by dysesthetic sensations-including burning pain, tingling, and numbness-in the lateral aspect of the thigh. This condition results from the entrapment or compression of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) as it passes beneath or through the inguinal ligament near the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). Common etiological factors include obesity, pregnancy, tight clothing, rapid weight changes, and direct trauma, which increase mechanical stress on the nerve. Despite its relatively high prevalence, MP often remains underdiagnosed and can lead to significant chronic discomfort, functional limitations, and reduced quality of life.

The management of MP typically follows a conservative pathway, encompassing patient education, lifestyle modifications (e.g., avoidance of tight garments, weight loss), pharmacotherapy (such as neuropathic pain agents or corticosteroid injections), and physical therapy. However, evidence supporting the efficacy of these interventions is largely anecdotal or derived from low-quality studies, and a substantial proportion of patients experience persistent symptoms refractory to standard care. For those with intractable pain, invasive procedures like surgical decompression or neurectomy may be considered, though these carry inherent risks of surgical complications and permanent sensory loss. Consequently, there is a pressing need to identify and evaluate novel, effective, and non-invasive therapeutic modalities for MP.

High-Power Laser Therapy (HPLT), also known as high-intensity laser therapy, represents an advanced non-thermal phototherapeutic modality that has gained increasing attention in musculoskeletal and neuropathic pain management. Operating at power outputs typically ranging from 1 to 15 Watts, HPLT utilizes wavelengths (often 980 nm or 1064 nm) that allow for deep tissue penetration. Unlike its low-level counterpart (LLLT), which primarily exerts photobiomodulatory effects, HPLT delivers significant photothermal energy. Its proposed mechanisms of action are multifactorial, including deep tissue analgesia, reduction of inflammation, enhanced microcirculation, and accelerated nerve regeneration. These properties make HPLT a theoretically ideal intervention for entrapment neuropathies like MP, where reducing local inflammation and mechanical stress around the nerve is a primary treatment goal.

Although the application of LLLT for various neuropathies has been explored, the body of literature investigating the specific role of HPLT in compressive mononeuropathies, particularly MP, remains in its infancy. A limited number of studies and case reports have suggested promising analgesic and functional outcomes with HPLT in similar conditions, but robust, randomized controlled trials are lacking.

Therefore, the primary objective of this randomized, sham-controlled, assessor-blinded study is to investigate the efficacy of HPLT as an adjunct to standard conservative care on pain intensity, sensory symptoms, and functional capacity in patients with chronic Meralgia Paresthetica. The investigators hypothesize that patients receiving active HPLT will demonstrate significantly greater improvements in these outcomes compared to those receiving a sham laser procedure.

Enrollment

50 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 65 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18-65 years.
  • Clinical diagnosis of MP (based on history: burning pain, tingling, numbness in the lateral thigh; tenderness over the inguinal ligament near the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS); and a positive pelvic compression test or Tinel's sign over the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN)).
  • Symptoms persistent for at least 3 months (chronic).
  • A baseline pain intensity of ≥4 on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).

Exclusion criteria

  • Secondary MP (e.g., due to pelvic surgery, trauma, or tumor mass effect confirmed by imaging).
  • Significant lumbar radiculopathy (L1-L2).
  • Coagulopathy, use of anticoagulants.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Skin disease or infection in the treatment area.
  • Presence of a cardiac pacemaker.
  • Severe cognitive impairment.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

50 participants in 2 patient groups

Experimental Group: HPLT
Experimental group
Description:
Application Technique: Scanning technique. The laser probe will be moved slowly and continuously over the entire course of the LFCN (from just medial and inferior to the ASIS, distally along the thigh).
Treatment:
Device: High-power laser
Other: Standard Conservative Care
Control Group: Sham Laser
Sham Comparator group
Description:
Identical procedure as Group 1, but with a sham laser applicator that emits no therapeutic energy. The device will beep and display as if it is working.
Treatment:
Other: Sham laser
Other: Standard Conservative Care

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Ender Salbas, Asst. Prof.; Ali Y Karahan, Prof.

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems