The Efficiency of Computer Guided Ridge Splitting Using Piezosurgery in Horizontally Deficient Posterior Mandible

Cairo University (CU)

Status: Unknown

Conditions: Atrophic Posterior Mandible With Insufficient Width; Edentulous Patients

Treatments: Device: Computer Guided ridge splitting in posterior mandible

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT03748615

CairoUimplant master course

Details and patient eligibility

About

The use of implants has significantly increased prosthetic options for edentulous patient. However, implant placement in the Posterior mandibular region is often hampered significantly by insufficient atrophic width limitations

Full description

Ridge splitting technique causes lateral ridge expansion which creates new implant bed by longitudinal osteotomy, positioning buccal cortex laterally. The buccal cortex is positioned laterally to create space between buccal and lingual cortical plates, which is filled by an endosseous implant with or without any graft material limitations.

Ridge split technique is a very predictable procedure that can achieve substantial gains in horizontal ridge width of the edentulous posterior mandible without associated morbidity. This technique allows the clinician to augment the site and do the implant insertion in a single stage surgery, shortening the healing period drastically.

In the conventional ridge splitting technique, a complete flap is raised to allow adequate visibility of the bone defect which can result in disturbance of vascular supply and increase bone resorption rates. In this case report, a new innovative computer guided closed alveolar ridge splitting flapless technique has been advocated to avoid this disruption.

As Guided implant placement showed a statistically superior accuracy when they are compared with freehand placement after guided osteotomy Computer guided ridge splitting may have a superior accuracy than the freehand ridge splitting and may reduce the time of surgery, healing period and post-operative pain.

Enrollment: 10 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 25 to 60 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Patients with edentulous posterior area of the mandible insufficient width less than 5m, Both sexes.
• No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology
• No systemic condition that contraindicate implant placement.

Exclusion criteria

• Heavy smokers more than 20 cigarettes per day.
• Patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing.
• Psychiatric problems.
• Disorders to implant are related to history of radiation therapy to the head and neck neoplasia, or bone augmentation to implant site.
• Immunodeficiency pathology, bruxism, stress situation (socially or professionally), emotional instability, and unrealistic aesthetic demands.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: N/A

Interventional model: Single Group Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

10 participants in 1 patient group

Computer Guided ridge splitting in posterior mandible

Experimental group

Description:

fabrication of a computer aided surgical guide and performing ridge splitting in posterior mandible using piezosurgery

Treatment:

Device: Computer Guided ridge splitting in posterior mandible