ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

The Immediate Effect of Mulligan's Mobilization With Movement on Shoulder Girdle' Pain, Range of Motion and Muscle Activity, in Subjects With Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

E

Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde do Porto

Status

Completed

Conditions

Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

Treatments

Procedure: Mulligan's Mobilization With Movement
Procedure: Active Mobilization

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of present study was to evaluate the immediate effect of Mulligan's mobilization with movement on shoulder girdle' pain, range of motion (ROM) and muscle activity, in subjects with shoulder impingement syndrome

Full description

A randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted with a sample composed by twenty-four volunteers with SIS, divided in Mulligan's MWM and Placebo groups. Pain intensity in Neer impingement signal and Hawkins-Kennedy impingement test, pressure pain threshold (PPT) on the lateral aspect of shoulder, ROM of shoulder scaption until onset of pain, as well as the activity of trapezius (upper, middle and lower fibers) and serratus anterior muscles during this movement, were evaluated before and immediate (post-) intervention. The Mulligan's MWM group received a mobilization with movement technique in the glenohumeral joint (sustained posterolateral glide during shoulder scaption), while no effective intervention was performed in the Placebo group.

Enrollment

24 patients

Sex

All

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Participants had superolateral shoulder pain and two out of four specified objective signs and symptoms:

  • positive Neer test;
  • positive Hawkins-Kennedy test;
  • painful limitation of active arm elevation (flexion, abduction, scaption);
  • pain or limitation with functional movement patterns of hand behind back or hand behind head.

Exclusion criteria

  • physician diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis;
  • grade III rotator cuff tear;
  • calcific tendinosis confirmed by radiology;
  • systemic or neurological disorder;
  • cervical radiculopathy; a history of shoulder surgery;
  • corticosteroid injection within the past month;
  • subjects who had received physical therapy intervention for their shoulder within the past three months.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

24 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

Intervention group
Experimental group
Description:
The Mulligan's MWM group received mobilization with movement in the glenohumeral joint, as described by Mulligan. The participant was seated, and the physiotherapist was placed on the opposite side to the affected shoulder with the thenar eminence of one hand over the anterior aspect of the humeral head, and the other hand over the spine of the scapula posteriorly of the affected shoulder. The hand over the humeral head performed a posterolateral glide, while the other hand stabilized the scapula. This maneuver was sustained while the participant asked to raise the arm in scapular plan (as explained above) without pain. The physiotherapist previously determined the amount of posterolateral pressure which was the best to abolish the pain during shoulder scaption for each participant.
Treatment:
Procedure: Mulligan's Mobilization With Movement
Placebo Group
Placebo Comparator group
Description:
In the Placebo group, no effective intervention was performed, the participant was asked to raise the affected arm in scapular plane without pain, while the physiotherapist placed their hands-on shoulder, with the same manual contacts described in Mulligan's MWM group, but without performing any pressure.
Treatment:
Procedure: Active Mobilization

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems