Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This research is being done to try to improve the experience of mothers and babies during therapeutic hypothermia. Currently, mothers are not able to hold their baby during hypothermia treatment. Mothers have reported that not being able to hold their baby during this time is stressful. Additionally, it is known that holding has many benefits for mothers' and babies' psychological and physical health.
Therapeutic hypothermia is the standard of care. The experimental interventions of this study are to have mothers hold their babies during this treatment, collect saliva samples from mothers and babies, and test the saliva samples for the hormones cortisol and oxytocin. The investigators will test saliva of infants and their mothers before and after holding. The investigators hope to demonstrate decreased cortisol, a marker for stress, and increased oxytocin, a marker for bonding, in infants and mothers while they are held during therapeutic hypothermia.
Full description
The inability to hold an infant being treated with therapeutic hypothermia in the neonatal intensive care unit has been subjectively reported by ours and other research groups as a significant source of stress for parents. The investigators aim to assess the impact of holding on endocrinological markers of stress and bonding. Specifically, the investigators plan to collect salivary cortisol and oxytocin levels from infants undergoing therapeutic hypothermia and their mothers prior to and immediately after a 30-minute holding period.
The investigators hypothesize that measurable increases in salivary oxytocin levels, coinciding with the reported qualitative increased levels of bonding, will be observed after the holding period. The investigators anticipate the reported stress reduction after holding to be quantified by measurable decreases in salivary cortisol levels. The investigators hypothesize these hormone changes will be present in both the mother and the infant when compared to samples taken without the holding intervention.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
34 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal