The Impact of Lumboscopy Versus Laparoscopy on Ventilatory Mechanics

University of Chile

Status: Not yet enrolling

Conditions: Respiratory Physiology; Mechanical Ventilation; Anesthesia

Study type: Observational

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT06776068

CR/23053

Details and patient eligibility

About

There are several techniques for performing minimally invasive urological surgeries. Among them, laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery, and lumboscopy are noteworthy (1). The medical literature extensively documents the impact of pneumoperitoneum a procedure involving the insufflation of the peritoneal cavity with carbon dioxide (CO2), which is essential for laparoscopic and robotic surgeries on ventilatory mechanics.

As an alternative, CO2 insufflation into the retroperitoneum, as utilized in lumboscopic surgery, has been proposed. This approach is believed to exert a lesser impact on respiratory function and pulmonary mechanics. However, it is important to note that no conclusive evidence has yet been found to support this claim.

Assessing the impact of lumboscopic surgery could help establish it as a viable alternative for patients with pulmonary conditions, where mechanical ventilation poses significant challenges. To explore this possibility, a physiological study was designed to compare the effects of laparoscopic and lumboscopic surgery on ventilatory mechanics.

Enrollment: 40 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18+ years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Age >18 years old
• ASA PS II-III
• Elective surgery
• Surgery: Partial or total nephrectomy

Exclusion criteria

• Severe pulmonary pathology
• Severe cardiovascular pathology
• Open surgery

Trial design

40 participants in 1 patient group

Adult patients undergoing general anesthesia for laparoscopic and lumboscopic nephrectomy

Description:

Adult patients undergoing general anesthesia for laparoscopic and lumboscopic nephrectomy.