ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

The Impact of Retraction Cords on the Gingival Margin Level.

U

University of Jordan

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Gingival Retraction
Gingival Recession
Periodontal Health

Treatments

Procedure: Non-impregnated retraction cords/ more than 10 minutes
Drug: impregnated gingival retraction cord - less than 10 minutes
Drug: impregnated gingival retraction cord - more than 10 minutes
Procedure: Non-impregnated retraction cords/ less than 10 minutes

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05949073
Retraction cords

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between placing specific retraction cord for different periods of time and the post-operative gingival margin level in humans. Determining the amount of immediate reversible and delayed irreversible gingival recession (vertical gingival retraction) that might happen after placing a retraction cord around a natural tooth in healthy humans. It also aims to investigate the impact of mechanical and chemo-mechanical gingival retraction on periodontal health.

Full description

Dental impression is the communication tool between the dentist and the dental technician during the fabrication of fixed dental prosthesis, capturing a precise impression of the prepared tooth and the finish line is mandatory to ensure the perfect fitting of the final prosthesis.

Atraumatic gingival displacement is performed to provide sufficient both lateral and vertical space between the finish line and the gingival tissue that will allow recording adequate amount of unprepared tooth structure with the least distortion of impression material as well as minimal damage to attachment apparatus of the tooth as maintaining a healthy periodontium is an important factor in the survival of any fixed prosthesis.

The gingival recession that might happen after soft tissue displacement may jeopardize treatment success in esthetic areas of the mouth. Knowledge about the soft tissue reaction to one of the most common gingival displacement methods (retraction cords) is critical yet limited. Also, there is a gap in knowledge about the safety of retraction cords when used for multiple teeth preparations and would then be left in the sulcus for an extended amount of time, as well as the potential harm they can do in terms of persistent gingival recession.

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between placing specific retraction cords for different periods of time and the post-operative gingival margin level in humans. Determining the amount of immediate reversible and delayed irreversible gingival recession (vertical gingival retraction) that might happen after placing a retraction cord around a natural tooth in healthy humans. It also aims to investigate the impact of mechanical and chemo-mechanical gingival retraction on periodontal health.

This clinical study is expected to be useful for dental clinicians who use retraction cords during restorative procedures (cervical composite restorations) or for fixed prostheses; awareness about the amount of transient and permanent gingival recession that could occur is important to avoid undesirable effects such as esthetic issues and/or sensitivity.

Enrollment

60 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 50 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age of 18-50 years
  2. Systemically healthy no history of medical disease
  3. Volunteers should have a lower first molar indicated for full coverage restoration, of healthy periodontium with an antagonist tooth and proximal contacts.
  4. Gingival index score 0,1
  5. Plaque index score 0,1
  6. Probing depth ≤3 mm
  7. No bleeding on probing.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Gingival and periodontal disease
  2. Pregnancy and lactation
  3. History of systemic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, HIV, bone metabolic disorders, radiation therapy, and cancer.
  4. History of prolonged use of steroids/immunosuppressive agents/aspirin/anticoagulant/other medications.
  5. Heavy Smoking.
  6. Deleterious habits.
  7. Teeth with high scalloped margins, keratinized tissue less than 2 mm, fibrotic gingival tissue, gingival recession, pocket formation deeper than 3mm.
  8. Teeth with thick flat gingival phenotype.
  9. Teeth with Sub-gingival caries or restoration at the buccal surface.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Prevention

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

60 participants in 4 patient groups

Non impregnated gingival retraction cord - less than 10 minutes
Active Comparator group
Description:
Non impregnated gingival retraction cord will be placed around the prepared tooth and left for less than 10 minutes.
Treatment:
Procedure: Non-impregnated retraction cords/ less than 10 minutes
Non impregnated gingival retraction cord - more than 10 minutes
Active Comparator group
Description:
Non impregnated gingival retraction cord will be placed around the prepared tooth and left for more than 10 minutes.
Treatment:
Procedure: Non-impregnated retraction cords/ more than 10 minutes
impregnated gingival retraction cord - less than 10 minutes
Active Comparator group
Description:
Impregnated gingival retraction cord will be placed around the prepared tooth and left for less than 10 minutes.
Treatment:
Drug: impregnated gingival retraction cord - less than 10 minutes
impregnated gingival retraction cord - more than 10 minutes
Active Comparator group
Description:
Impregnated gingival retraction cord will be placed around the prepared tooth and left for more than 10 minutes.
Treatment:
Drug: impregnated gingival retraction cord - more than 10 minutes

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Mohammad Al-Rabab'ah, Phd; Majdoleen Fouad, Msc

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems