Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The progression of lung disease in cystic fibrosis (CF) results inevitably in a reduction in exercise capacity. The assessment of fitness and exercise capacity in CF is an important measure of the impact of the disease process, particularly if it is repeated over time. With recent advances in clinical management, CF lung disease in children can be relatively mild and exercise tolerance good. The currently available field tests e.g. 3 minute step test, are often completed too easily. These tests provide limited information relating to maximal exercise performance. By contrast, the maximal CardioPulmonary Exercise Test (CPET), a progressive, incremental, gold standard exercise test with breath by breath analysis of expired gas, has proved to be a valuable means of assessing exercise response in patients with CF. Its only limitation is the requirement for specialist laboratory facilities, equipment and staff.
A new field test for evaluating exercise capacity in children is needed. This should be portable, easy to administer and simple to perform by young children, while providing a higher intensity of exercise which correlates with day to day activity patterns of children, and clinically relevant information in the short term and longitudinally. This test needs to be a good surrogate measure of exercise capacity when formal CPET is unable to be undertaken. By providing accurate and useful information the results can be used to prescribe and train individuals with CF safely and effectively and can also be used in the short and long term for guidance of the medical management of these complex patients.
The aim of this study is to develop and validate the use of a new incremental step test to assess exercise tolerance/capacity in children with CF, compare this with the gold standard CPET and to provide normative healthy control comparison data The main objectives of the study are
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Clinical population inclusion
Healthy control population inclusion
Exclusion criteria
Clinical population exclusion
Healthy control population exclusion
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
24 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal