ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

The Japan-Combined Treatment With Olmesartan and a Calcium Channel Blocker Versus Olmesartan and Diuretics Randomized Efficacy Study (J-CORE)

J

Jichi Medical University

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 4

Conditions

Hypertension

Treatments

Drug: Olmesartan medoxomil +Azelnidipine
Drug: Olmesartan medoxomil + Hydrochlorothiazide

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT00607035
J_Core_071226
J_Core_071226_01

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to investigate which combination therapy is more effective for improving the blood pressure (BP) and reducing target organ damage in Japanese hypertensive patients: Angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) plus calcium channel blocker (CCB) or ARB plus diuretics.

Full description

Renin-angiotensin (RA) inhibitors have been demonstrated to be the most effective drugs for reducing subclinical target organ damage in hypertensive patients. In several patients, however, BP control is not sufficiently achieved by RA inhibitors alone, and a combination of two drugs is frequently required. It is unclear whether a combination of RA inhibitors and diuretics or CCB is more effective in reducing hypertensive target organ damage. Control of central BP has been shown to be more effective than peripheral BP in predicting cardiovascular events and target organ damage associated with hypertension. The J-CORE study is active controlled, 2-arm parallel group comparison, prospective randomized open blinded end-point (PROBE) design study. The ARB plus CCB combination therapy group is administered olmesartan 20 mg/day and azelnidipine 16 mg/day and the ARB plus diuretics combination therapy group receives olmesartan 20 mg/day and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg/day. At least 100 patients will be enrolled in each group and the follow up duration will be 24 weeks. The primary endpoint is to compare the changes in the central aortic BP and the ambulatory BP between the two groups. The secondary endpoint is to compare the changes in office BP, home BP, and hypertensive target organ damage between the two groups.

Enrollment

220 patients

Sex

All

Ages

30 to 85 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Hypertensive outpatients aged 30 years or older, and less than 85 years (at the time of informed consent), regardless of sex
  • Office systolic BP/diastolic BP > 140/90 mmHg in a sitting position even if on treatment with olmesartan 20 mg/day for 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

  • Secondary hypertension or malignant hypertension
  • History of myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accidents within 6 months prior to the screening
  • Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) done within 6 months of screening or scheduled
  • Current treatment for congestive cardiac failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class II or severer) or ejection fraction <40%
  • Atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
  • Renal dysfunction (serum creatinine ≥2 mg/dl)
  • Hepatic dysfunction (AST and/or ALT ≥100 IU/l)

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

220 participants in 2 patient groups

A
Experimental group
Description:
The ARB plus CCB combination therapy group is administered olmesartan 20 mg/day and azelnidipine 16 mg/day for 6 months.
Treatment:
Drug: Olmesartan medoxomil +Azelnidipine
H
Experimental group
Description:
The ARB plus Diuretics combination therapy group is administered olmesartan medoxomil 20mg/day and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5mg/day for 6 months.
Treatment:
Drug: Olmesartan medoxomil + Hydrochlorothiazide

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2024 Veeva Systems