Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
What is the effect of early high frequency oscillation (HFO) versus a lung-protective conventional ventilation (CV) strategy (using HFO only as rescue therapy), on all-cause hospital mortality among patients with severe early acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)?
Full description
High frequency oscillation is theoretically ideal for lung protection. Based on a strong physiological rationale, rapidly expanding use internationally, and promising results in early small RCTS, a definitive RCT to establish the impact of HFO versus current conventional ventilation on mortality is needed. We have completed a pilot multicentre RCT in preparation for this trial, with goals of investigating patient recruitment, protocol acceptance, and crossover rates. The pilot study met all objectives including recruitment that exceeded expectations (94 patients), and very good adherence to protocol. Results of the multinational OSCILLATE Trial will establish the impact of HFO versus conventional ventilation on mortality rates among adults with severe ARDS.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
In addition, to qualify for randomization, patients are assessed on the following ventilator settings:
After at least 30 minutes on these settings, we sample arterial blood to assess oxygenation. If PaO2 is less than or equal to 200 mmHg, the patient qualifies for randomization; if PaO2/FiO2 greater than 200 mmHg, standardized hypoxaemia assessments are repeated at least once daily for the following 72 hours (providing eligibility criteria are still met).
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
548 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal