Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Restless leg syndrome (RLS) is not uncommon and can also affect people's health and quality of life. Mainly, RLS is diagnosed based on clinical criteria subjectively. Sometimes it is difficult to differentiate between RLS and mimickers, especially in patients with comorbidities such as diabetes or parkinson's disease. We believe that using objective tests would facilitate accuracy in RLS diagnosis, which leads to proper management of patients.
Full description
Restless legs syndrome (RLS) represents disturbing symptoms in the lower limbs that lead to the urge to move, occurring in rest periods. Movements can partially or completely relieve these abnormal feelings. In 2014, the International RLS Study Group (IRLSSG) established five mandatory criteria for the diagnosis of RLS1.
IRLSSG essential diagnostic criteria for RLS (all must be met):
The nonpharmacologic treatment of RLS includes stretching, heating, or cooling the extremities (e.g., a warm bath), and avoiding alcohol and caffeine. However, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved physical devices such as compression stockings, heating and vibrating pads, and foot pressure wraps for the treatment of RLS9.
Pharmacologic treatment: The latest clinical practice guideline (CPG) updates the 2024 American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) practice parameters and offers new recommendations for treating RLS in adult patients. The primary change in these recommendations is the inclusion of alpha-2-delta ligands (gabapentin, gabapentin enacarbil, and pregabalin) in the 'strong recommendation' category, along with a transition from the use of dopamine agonists to a 'conditional recommendation' in order to mitigate side effects such as augmentation and impulse control disorders 10.
Patients with RLS experience significant adverse effects on work performance, quality of life, cognition, and health11,12. A survey study conducted in the United States that examined the disease burden of primary RLS found that work productivity is diminished by approximately 20%, which equates to about one day per 40-hour work week for individuals with moderate to severe RLS. The mean EQ-5D health utility score indicated a significantly lower health status compared to the healthy control group. Additionally, RLS negatively impacts sleep quality, with 60-70% of patients reporting poor sleep11. RLS not only causes impaired quality of life but also possibly leads to cardiovascular consequences. RLS was associated with statistically significantly less future cardiovascular risk in RLS patients with treatment than in those without treatment13.
The diagnosis of RLS is primarily based on a clinical history of an urge to move the limbs that worsens when at rest, improves with movement, and is more prominent in the evening or at night. These four criteria have a positive predictive value (PPV) of 76% when an expert interview is used as the gold standard. Carefully distinguishing RLS from leg cramps or positional discomfort increases the specificity of the four criteria from 84% to 94%14. However, some RLS mimics, such as nocturnal leg cramps or neuropathy, still cannot be addressed solely by clinical history or basic RLS screening instruments. Consequently, there should be standardized objective tests for RLS beyond clinical diagnosis.
The Suggested Immobilization Test (SIT) is a provocative test. RLS symptoms (urge to move the leg and leg paresthesia) are primarily observed during wakefulness, especially at rest, in the evening, and/or during the night. During the test, the patient remains in a bed (or a reclining chair), at a 45° angle with legs outstretched. Originally, the SIT only quantified leg motor activity. Since 2002, it also includes the assessment of leg discomfort, which is estimated by the patient every 5 min, on a 100-mm horizontal visual analogue scale. Leg movements are quantified using surface electromyography (EMG) from bilateral anterior tibialis muscles. Using these pathological thresholds, the clinical RLS/WED diagnosis is correctly predicted in 88% of subjects with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 100%15,16.
It was not only used for diagnosis but also for measuring the severity of symptoms. Patients with severe RLS show more leg movements during the SIT than those with moderate or mild RLS. Additionally, it can help differentiate RLS mimics, which can be challenging with only a clinical diagnosis, as mentioned above. Moreover, it would benefit special populations, especially those with Parkinson's disease or Multiple sclerosis, who have some symptoms that could confound the diagnosis of restless leg syndrome17,18. The low cost and the ability to repeat the tests multiple times throughout the day are the two main advantages of SIT. It can also be done on the same day as a routine sleep test.
To the best of investigator's knowledge, this is the first pilot study of SIT for confirmation of restless leg syndrome in the Thai population. Early diagnosis with a high-accuracy test would lead to appropriate treatment planning and better outcomes in Thai RLS patients.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
30 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Jindapa Srikajon, M.D.
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal