Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Objectives: to evaluate xerostomia and salivary flow in patients with burning mouth syndrome (BMS) treated with amitriptyline before and after the use of antixerostomic topical medication.
Methods: In this case-control double-blinded study, we enrolled 38 patients with BMS diagnosed according to the (IASP). The subjects were randomly divided into two groups: Study Group: 19 patients whom received topical medication of urea 10% and Control Group: 19 patients whom received placebo to apply at the oral cavity 3-4 times per day, during three months. The patients were evaluated before and after the above treatment. Finally, data were statistically analyzed.
It is know that BMS is eventually associated to reduced salivary flow (Cho et al.,2010; Kho et al., 2010; Marino et al., 2010) and to abnormal salivary composition (increasing concentrations of K+, Na+, Cl-, Ca+2, IgA, amylase) (Patton et al., 2007). Even in the absence of hyposalivation, patients may complain of xerostomia and dry mouth (Cho et al.,2010; Kho et al., 2010; Marino et al., 2010; Thomson, 2005). These patients also have several sensory losses even in taste and smell function, recently described (Siqueira et al., 2006a; Siqueira et al., 2006b; Siviero et al., 2011).
Full description
Materials and Methods In this case-control double-blinded study, we enrolled 38 patients with BMS diagnosed according to the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) (17), that had been followed at the Craniofacial Pain Clinic of Hospital das Clinicas, School of Medicine of the University of Sao Paulo. All subjects were informed about the purposes of the study, and all signed the informed consent. The protocol had been approved by the local Ethics Committee. No patient had hyposalivation at the moment of diagnosis by the quantitative evaluation. All patients had been treated with 25mg-50mg of amitriptyline within the last three months. They underwent laboratory tests and careful exam to exclude other causes of burning mouth (10).
The exclusion criteria were other facial pain syndromes, other causes for abnormal salivation, other neuropathies or primary diseases associated to burning mouth, inability to answer the questions and / or tests
The subjects were randomly divided into two groups:
The patients were evaluated before and after the above treatment with the following instruments:
EDOF-HC protocol (Orofacial Pain Clinic - Hospital das Clinicas): a standardized orofacial pain questionnaire to detail: 1) chief complaint, 2) general pain characteristics (location, quality, duration, pain relief, pain triggering), 3) headache and/or body pain complaints, and 4) patient's medical history and co-morbidities (18,19);
Xerostomia questionnaire (20);
Quantitative sensory testing. All subjects underwent a standardized protocol of quantitative sensory testing (QST) (21) which consists of twelve tests grouped as follows:
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
38 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal