ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

The Thermogenic and Metabolic Effects of a Whole Food Meal Versus Its Supplemental Equivalent

Skidmore College logo

Skidmore College

Status

Completed

Conditions

Weight Loss

Treatments

Other: Whole Food Meal
Other: Supplement Food Meal

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04453254
1302-333

Details and patient eligibility

About

There is limited research on the amount of calories burned and metabolic differences of a complete supplemental meal in comparison to a whole food meal. The purpose of this study is to analyze the differences in calories burned and metabolic response post-consumption of a meal consisting of whole foods compared to its nutritionally engineered equivalent. Investigators hypothesize that energy expenditure and satiety will be greater following consumption of the whole food meal compared to the supplement meal, whereas, there will be no difference in levels of glucose between the two conditions.

Full description

Over 50% of U.S. adults today use some form of dietary supplementation to obtain their nutrient intake. Previous research has shown that certain nutritional supplements may produce varying metabolic and thermogenic (calories burned) responses, when compared to other food sources. The difference in thermogenic response may also suggest that there is a difference between a whole food meal and its supplemental equivalent. If there is a difference in thermogenic response, this may indicate that a meal-replacing supplement, such as a ready-to-drink-shake and/or food bar may not induce the same health benefits as a whole food meal in terms of nutrient digestion, absorption, metabolism and storage. There has not been extensive research on the thermic effect and metabolic differences of a complete supplemental meal in comparison to a whole food meal. The purpose of this study is to analyze the differences in thermogenic and metabolic response post-consumption of a meal consisting of whole foods compared to its supplemental, engineered equivalent. It's hypothesized that energy expenditure and satiety will be greater following the whole food meal compared to the supplement meal, whereas, there will be no difference in levels of glucose between the two conditions.

Enrollment

10 patients

Sex

Female

Ages

18 to 24 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Young healthy females

Exclusion criteria

  • Participants with specific dietary needs.
  • Those with diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, low blood sugar (hypoglycemia) and participants who are classified as high risk.
  • Participants with lactose intolerance.
  • Participants who regularly use dietary supplements.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Other

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

10 participants in 2 patient groups

Whole Food Meal
Active Comparator group
Description:
A whole meal consisting of 1 cup 2% milk, 1 cup Kashi Go Lean Original cereal, ¼ cup of almonds, ¼ cup of strawberries, and ¼ cup of raspberries.
Treatment:
Other: Whole Food Meal
Supplement Food Meal
Active Comparator group
Description:
A supplemental meal equivalent consisting of 1 cup 2% milk, 20 g whey protein, ½ EAS Myoplex bar, and ½ Balance bar.
Treatment:
Other: Supplement Food Meal

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems