ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

The Use of 2% Chlorhexidine Gluconate With Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Indirect Pulp Treatment of Primary Molars

K

King Abdulaziz University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Indirect Pulp Treatment

Treatments

Other: Mineral trioxide aggregate.
Other: 2% chlorhexidine gluconate with mineral trioxide aggregate.

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic success rates of indirect pulp treatment (IPT) performed by combining 2% chlorhexidine gluconate with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) versus IPT performed with MTA in children's vital primary molars. A randomized, split-mouth design including 40 children aged 4-8 years was implemented. The study sample composed of 80 primary molars with deep carious lesions. Each child had 1 pair, one tooth from each pair was allocated randomly either to the 2% chlorhexidine gluconate/MTA group or the MTA group. All teeth were restored with stainless steel crowns. Follow-up is carried out to evaluate the teeth clinically and radiographically.

Full description

A double blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial was performed in a split-mouth design. Eighty primary molars in forty subjects were randomly allocated that each subject had one tooth treated with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and MTA (experimental group), and the other tooth treated with only MTA (control group).

The study was held at King Abdulaziz University Dental Hospital (KAUDH), Jeddah. Forty healthy children with the age range 4- to 8-year-old were included. Each patient had at least two first primary molars or two second primary molars with deep occlusal or proximal caries not approaching the pulp indicated for IPT.

Preoperative periapical radiographs of the teeth considered for treatment in the study were made using extension cone paralleling technique in the x ray machine.

The procedure was performed in two visits by one operator to allow for the setting of MTA. Stainless steel crowns were used as final restorations.

Enrollment

40 patients

Sex

All

Ages

4 to 8 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Patient inclusion criteria:

  • 4-8 years old.
  • Healthy.
  • Cooperative.
  • Had at least two first primary molars or two second primary molars with deep occlusal or proximal caries not approaching the pulp indicated for IPT.

Teeth inclusion criteria:

  • No spontaneous pain.
  • No pain on palpation or percussion.
  • No signs of fistula or abscess.
  • No abnormal mobility.
  • No radiolucency at the periapical or interradicular areas.
  • No loss of lamina dura.
  • No radiographic signs of internal resorption.
  • Sufficient tooth structure allowing placement of rubber dam.
  • Not expected to exfoliate within 1 year.

Exclusion criteria

  • Spontaneous pain.
  • Pain on palpation or percussion.
  • Signs of fistula or abscess.
  • Presence of abnormal mobility.
  • Radiolucency at the periapical or interradicular areas.
  • Loss of lamina dura.
  • Radiographic signs of internal resorption.
  • No sufficient tooth structure allowing placement of rubber dam.
  • Expected to exfoliate within 1 year.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Triple Blind

40 participants in 2 patient groups

Experimental group
Experimental group
Description:
2% chlorhexidine gluconate with mineral trioxide aggregate.
Treatment:
Other: 2% chlorhexidine gluconate with mineral trioxide aggregate.
Control group
Active Comparator group
Description:
Mineral trioxide aggregate.
Treatment:
Other: Mineral trioxide aggregate.

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems