ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

The Use of the 25 (OH) D Saliva Test as a Substitute for the 25 (OH) D Serum Test in Healthy People

U

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Status

Completed

Conditions

Nutritional Deficiency

Treatments

Diagnostic Test: consumed vitamin D supplements regularly
Diagnostic Test: not currently consumed vitamin D supplements regularly

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04655664
USumateraUtara 1

Details and patient eligibility

About

Routine examination of vitamin D levels is carried out by checking serum 25 (OH)D levels, which indicate circulating vitamin D levels. While serum 1.25 (OH) D levels are less frequently utilized, they represent the active form of vitamin D and could be a substitute for checking vitamin D levels. This study aims to find the correlation between vitamin D levels, namely 25 (OH) D and 1.25 (OH) D saliva, which correlate with serum 25 (OH) D and 1.25 (OH) D levels in the examination of salivary vitamin D, and which could be a substitute for checking serum vitamin D levels.

Full description

Routine examination of vitamin D levels is carried out by checking serum 25 (OH)D levels, which indicate circulating vitamin D levels. While serum 1.25 (OH) D levels are less frequently utilized, they represent the active form of vitamin D and could be a substitute for checking vitamin D levels.This study aims to find the correlation between vitamin D levels, namely 25 (OH) D and 1.25 (OH) D saliva, which correlate with serum 25 (OH) D and 1.25 (OH) D levels in the examination of salivary vitamin D, and which could be a substitute for checking serum vitamin D levels.This study is a cross-sectional study involving healthy men and women, aged 20-50 years, from Lima Puluh Village, Batubara District, North Sumatra Province, Indonesia. The parameters studied were 25 (OH) D and 1.25 (OH) D levels of saliva and serum.

Enrollment

56 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 60 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • men and women aged 18-60 years, not currently experiencing chronic pain, kidney problems, liver problems, or other hormone disorders.

Exclusion criteria

  • subjects who consumed vitamin D supplements regularly, were pregnant, or were breastfeeding.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Diagnostic

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

56 participants in 2 patient groups

Treatment Group
Experimental group
Description:
Men and women aged 18-60 years, not currently experiencing chronic pain, kidney problems, liver problems, or other hormone disorders
Treatment:
Diagnostic Test: not currently consumed vitamin D supplements regularly
Regularly Group
Active Comparator group
Description:
Subjects who consumed vitamin D supplements regularly, were pregnant, or were breastfeeding.
Treatment:
Diagnostic Test: consumed vitamin D supplements regularly

Trial documents
1

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems