ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Therapeutic Effect of Direct Current Stimulation on Cognitive Function of Mild to Moderate Alzheimer Patients

A

Assiut University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Alzheimer Disease

Treatments

Procedure: direct current stimulation using cathodal electrode
Procedure: Sham direct current stimulation
Procedure: Direct current stimulation using Anodal electrode

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT01746498
Direct current in Alzheimer's

Details and patient eligibility

About

The current study is planed to compare the efficacy of real (anodal and cathodal) vs sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on cognitive functions and cortical excitability of patients with Alzheimer disease (AD).

Thirty three with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients (diagnosis of probable AD according to the criteria of the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke Alzheimer Disease and Related Disorders Association [NINCDS-ADRDA] were included in this study) were randomly classified into one of three groups (eleven for each group). The first group received anodal tDCS over left DLPFC and 2rd group received cathodal tDCS on the left DLPFC and the 3rd group received sham tDCS stimulation, daily for 10 consecutive days (5 days/week for 2 weeks). Minimental State Examination (MMSE), psychometric assessment for cognitive functions (MMSE, Wechsler memory scale, Wechsler adult Intelligent scale) were assessed before, after 10th sessions, and then after 1 and 2 month. Cortical excitability was assessed in both hemispheres before and after the end of sessions. Neurophysiological evaluations included resting and active motor threshold (rMT and aMT), and cortical silent period (CSP).

At the time of recruitment, none of the patients taking antidepressants, or neuroleptic, sedative-hypnotic drugs for at least two weeks before the assessment. All participants or their caregivers will give informed consent before participation in the test and after full explanation of the study protocol.

Outcome: The real group received (anodal and cathodal) tDCS are expected to have more improvement on cognitive functions compared to sham tDCS group. tDCS is considered new adjuvant non pharmacological therapeutic tool for management of AD patients with mild to moderate degree dementia.

Enrollment

33 patients

Sex

All

Ages

45 to 79 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Thirty patients with a diagnosis of probable AD according to the criteria of the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) (McKhann G et al.,1994) will be included in this study.

Exclusion criteria

  • previous history of stroke
  • Metabolic disturbances
  • Other major medical illness or epilepsy
  • Patients metallic objects in the body
  • Patients subjected to a craniotomy in the past.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

33 participants in 3 patient groups

Group 1
Active Comparator group
Description:
11 patients We Applied real anodal tDCS on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)20 minutes every day for 10 consecutive days.
Treatment:
Procedure: Direct current stimulation using Anodal electrode
Group 2
Active Comparator group
Description:
11 patients we applied cathodal tDCS on left DLPFC for 20 minutes every day for 10 consecutive days.
Treatment:
Procedure: direct current stimulation using cathodal electrode
Group 3
Sham Comparator group
Description:
11 patients We applied sham stimulations(anodal tDCS) on the left DLPFC for few seconds the stop stimulations 2 mA every day for 10 days.
Treatment:
Procedure: Sham direct current stimulation

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems