Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The primary objective of this study is to compare the performance of SUPRAFLEX to that of XIENCE in an all-comers patient population with symptomatic ischemic heart disease. The patients will be followed through 3 years for major clinical events.
Full description
This is a prospective, randomized, 1:1 balanced, controlled, single-blind, multi-center study comparing clinical outcomes at 12 months between SUPRAFLEX and XIENCE in a "Real world, all comers" patient population (patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease including patients with chronic stable angina, silent ischemia, and acute coronary syndromes, who qualify for percutaneous coronary interventions). The objective is to compare the SUPRAFLEX SES with the XIENCE EES with respect to target lesion failure (TLF) at 12 months in a non-inferiority trial in a "real world" patient population.
All patients will be (at minimum) contacted at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post procedure to assess clinical status and adverse events. The 30 day and 12 month will be a clinic visit. All patients will have annual contact through 3 years follow-up to assess clinical status and adverse events.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
All comers" patients:
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
1,435 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal