Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of "Schroth method" and "Scientific Exercise Approach to Scoliosis" for correcting idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents.
Full description
The Schroth Method has gained prominence in the treatment of scoliosis due to its individualized approach, focusing on three-dimensional corrections through specific exercises tailored to each patient's spinal curvature. This method emphasizes rotational breathing and postural awareness, aiming to improve posture, reduce pain, and halt curve progression. Studies have shown that the Schroth Method can effectively improve spinal alignment, reduce curve severity, and enhance overall quality of life in patients with scoliosis. As a non-surgical intervention, it offers a valuable option for patients seeking to manage scoliosis conservatively. In contrast, the Scientific Exercise Approach to Scoliosis (SEAS) is another evidence-based method designed to treat scoliosis. SEAS focus on active self-correction, proprioceptive training, and functional exercises to stabilize and support the spine during daily activities. This approach is grounded in the principles of biomechanics and motor control, with an emphasis on developing the patient's ability to maintain correct posture independently. SEAS has been shown to be effective in reducing the risk of scoliosis progression and in some cases, it may reduce the need for bracing or surgery.
Comparing the Schroth Method and Scientific Exercise Approach to Scoliosis reveals significant insights into their respective benefits and limitations. While both approaches aim to address scoliosis through non-invasive means, they differ in their specific techniques and theoretical foundations. The Schroth Method's emphasis on breathing and postural correction contrasts with SEAS's focus on active self-correction and functional integration. Understanding these differences is crucial for clinicians to tailor treatment plans according to individual patient needs and preferences. This comparative study aims to provide deeper insights into the efficacy of these two approaches, potentially guiding more effective treatment strategies for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
30 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Maya Galal Abd El Wahab, PhD; Mina Reda Rezk Nada, M.Sc
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal