ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Time of Positive Pressure Ventilation in Non-vigorous Infants Born Through Meconium-stained Amniotic Fluid (MASTIME)

U

University Hospital Padova

Status

Completed

Conditions

Infant, Newborn, Disease
Meconium Aspiration Syndrome
Neonatal Resuscitation

Treatments

Procedure: No endotracheal suctioning
Procedure: Endotracheal suctioning

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04076189
UHPadova02/2019

Details and patient eligibility

About

Background: Meconium stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) complicates 3 to 14% of pregnancies, causing meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) in 5-10% of neonates born. Due to lack of evidence of benefits of endotracheal suctioning at birth in non-vigorous infants, recent neonatal resuscitation guidelines do not recommend it as a routine and they suggest to start ventilation within the first minute of life, which may be critical to reverse asphyxia and stabilize the neonate. There are concerns regarding the safety and efficacy of this change in practice because it is not based on large randomized controlled trials. Besides that, the delay in the beginning of the PPV in these babies has not been previously explored.

Objective: to compare the time of PPV initiation between performing immediate laryngoscopy with intubation and suctioning and performing immediate PPV without intubation in a manikin.

Methods: Level III NICU consultants, residents, and fellows trained in advanced airway management will be randomly assigned to AB arm (endotracheal suction, followed by the procedure without endotracheal suction) and to BA arm (reverse sequence), with a washout period of 6 hour. During each simulation, an external observer will record the time of PPV initiation. The primary outcome measure will be the time of PPV initiation in the endotracheal suction arm compared to the control arm.

Full description

Background: Meconium stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) complicates 3 to 14% of pregnancies, causing meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) in 5-10% of neonates born. Due to lack of evidence of benefits of endotracheal suctioning at birth in non-vigorous infants, recent neonatal resuscitation guidelines do not recommend it as a routine and they suggest to start ventilation within the first minute of life, which may be critical to reverse asphyxia and stabilize the neonate. There are concerns regarding the safety and efficacy of this change in practice because it is not based on large randomized controlled trials. Besides that, the delay in the beginning of the PPV in these babies has not been previously explored.

Objective: to compare the time of PPV initiation between performing immediate laryngoscopy with intubation and suctioning and performing immediate PPV without intubation in a manikin.

Methods: Level III NICU consultants, residents, and fellows trained in advanced airway management will be randomly assigned to AB arm (endotracheal suction, followed by the procedure without endotracheal suction) and to BA arm (reverse sequence), with a washout period of 6 hour. During each simulation, an external observer will record the time of PPV initiation. The primary outcome measure will be the time of PPV initiation in the endotracheal suction arm compared to the control arm.

Enrollment

40 patients

Sex

All

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Level III NICU consultants, residents, and fellows trained in advanced airway management will be eligible to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

  • No exclusion criteria

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

40 participants in 2 patient groups

Endotracheal suctioning
Experimental group
Description:
Procedure includes: Endotracheal intubation-Suctioning-Endotracheal intubation again and initiation of positive pressure ventilation
Treatment:
Procedure: Endotracheal suctioning
No endotracheal suctioning
Active Comparator group
Description:
Procedure includes: Initiation of positive pressure ventilation without endotracheal suctioning
Treatment:
Procedure: No endotracheal suctioning

Trial contacts and locations

2

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems