Timing Impact of Early vs. Late Cranioplasty on Hemicraniectomy Outcomes (TIMELY)
Status
Conditions
Treatments
Details and patient eligibility
About
This prospective, randomized study aims to comprehensively evaluate the impact of cranioplasty timing on postoperative complications and long-term functional outcomes following decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC). The primary endpoint focuses on comparing the rates of various postoperative complications, including infection, seizures, return to the operating room, and the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunting, between patients undergoing standard of care cranioplasty (>3 months after DHC) and those receiving early cranioplasty (within 8 weeks).
Full description
This prospective, randomized study aims to comprehensively evaluate the impact of cranioplasty timing on postoperative complications and long-term functional outcomes following decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC). The primary endpoint focuses on comparing the rates of various postoperative complications, including infection, seizures, return to the operating room, and the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunting, between patients undergoing standard of care cranioplasty (>3 months after DHC) and those receiving early cranioplasty (within 8 weeks).
The primary endpoint involves a comprehensive evaluation of long-term functional outcomes at 6 months post-injury ("injury" defined as "acute traumatic injury or source of increased intracranial pressure secondary to stroke or intracranial hemorrhage"). This assessment aims to determine whether the timing of cranioplasty influences patients' neurological recovery, cognitive function, and overall quality of life. By comparing the outcomes of patients who undergo standard of care cranioplasty with those who undergo early cranioplasty, the study seeks to provide valuable insights into the potential benefits of the latter approach.
The findings of this research hold the potential to guide clinical practice and inform decision-making for patients who have undergone DHC. By considering a range of complications and incorporating a robust statistical framework, the study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the advantages and disadvantages associated with different cranioplasty timing strategies.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
- Adults of age greater than or equal to 18 years at the time of acute traumatic injury or source of increased intracranial pressure secondary to stroke or intracranial hemorrhage necessitating decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC)
- Patient's cranial flap fulfills Craniectomy Contour Class A or B after 4 weeks postoperatively (doi:10.1227/ons.0000000000000689)
- Medically optimized for general anesthesia/surgery
Exclusion criteria
- Active systemic infection in weeks 6-8 post-DHC leading up to cranioplasty (e.g. pneumonia, urinary tract infection, soft tissue infection, bacteremia)
- Cranial infection in the post-DHC period
- Patient deemed not appropriate for early cranioplasty by attending neurosurgeon
- Patient mortality prior to 8 weeks post-injury ("injury" defined as "acute traumatic injury or source of increased intracranial pressure causing brain injury secondary to stroke or intracranial hemorrhage")
Trial design
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
44 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group
Trial contacts and locations
Loading...
Central trial contact
Pious Patel, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal