ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

To Determine Optimal Time for Delivering Electrical Shocks to Cardiac Arrest Patients

S

Singapore Health Services (SingHealth)

Status

Completed

Conditions

Death
Ventricular Fibrillation
Sudden Cardiac Death
Ventricular Tachycardia
Cardiac Event

Treatments

Device: Upstroke Compression Defibrillation
Device: Precompression Defibrillation

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
Industry

Identifiers

NCT01665755
2011/456/C

Details and patient eligibility

About

In this study, we are comparing the difference in outcomes between patients who were given shocks to the heart, during the upstroke of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and before CPR is started. The study population will be all cardiac arrest patients attended by the staff of the Emergency Department who fulfil the eligibility criteria. Patients will be managed according to currently approved cardiac arrest protocols. Patients confirmed in cardiac arrest have manual chest compressions started while mechanical CPR (whereby chest compressions are delivered by an automated device) is prepared. Mechanical CPR should be started as soon as possible (<1 minute). If patients are eligible to be shocked, they will receive shocks either during upstroke of CPR or before CPR is started.

Thus the purpose of this study is to answer the question whether are there improvement in survival between when shocks are given during upstroke and before CPR is started.

Full description

The purpose of this study will be to compare shock success during defibrillation synchronized with the upstroke of chest compression (peak upstroke), and precompression (control). This will be the world's first study to characterize the phase dependency of defibrillation during mechanical CPR in humans and to evaluate if optimal synchronized defibrillation can improve clinical outcomes.

The null hypothesis would be that there is no difference in shock success during defibrillation synchronized with the upstroke of chest compression (peak upstroke), and precompression (control). We will conduct statistical comparisons for the primary and secondary outcomes between the arms of the study.

The study population will be all cardiac arrest patients attended by the staff of the ED over the study period who fulfill the eligibility criteria. Patients will be managed according to currently approved cardiac arrest protocols. Patients confirmed in cardiac arrest with have manual chest compressions started while mechanical CPR is prepared. Mechanical CPR should be started as soon as possible (<1 minunte). If a shockable rhythm is present (VF/VT), patients will receive one of pre-randomized defibrillation protocols:

  1. Synchronised defibrillation at peak-upstroke
  2. Synchronised defibrillation at precompression

Definition of outcomes

  • Shock success is defined as the termination of Ventricular Fibrillation (VF) or pulseless Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) and the establishment of organized rhythm within 60 seconds. An organized rhythm requires at least 2 QRS complexes separated by no more than 5 seconds.
  • Survival to hospital discharge is defined as patient surviving the primary event and discharged from the hospital alive.
  • Return of spontaneous circulation is defined as the presence of any palpable pulse, which is detected by manual palpation of a major artery.
  • Survival to admission is defined as the admission to hospital without ongoing CPR or other artificial circulatory support.

Enrollment

180 patients

Sex

All

Ages

21+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Cardiac Arrest patients who received eith CPR and/or defibrillation
  • Ventricular Fibrillation or Pulseless Ventricular Tachycardia

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients pronounced dead without attempting CPR according to standard operating procedure and ILCOR guidelines
  • Cardiac arrest obviously caused by major trauma
  • Children below age 21
  • Patients who are pregnant

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Non-Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

180 participants in 2 patient groups

Precompression
Experimental group
Description:
Control arm
Treatment:
Device: Precompression Defibrillation
Upstroke Compression
Active Comparator group
Description:
Intervention arm
Treatment:
Device: Upstroke Compression Defibrillation

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems