To Determine the Effectiveness of Saddle Block vs Spinal Anesthesia in TURP

Hamdard University

Status and phase: Completed; Phase 3

Conditions: Haemodynamic Instability

Treatments: Drug: 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT05285800

W0333

Details and patient eligibility

About

To determine the effectiveness of saddle block vs spinal anesthesia in TURP.

Full description

This study is being conducted to determine the effectiveness of saddle block vs spinal anesthesia in terms of haemodynamic stability and Vasopressor usage.

Enrollment: 60 patients

Sex: Male

Ages: 45 to 65 years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Patient with absolute contraindication of general anaesthsia
• Patients who gave consent and willing to be included in study
• Patient's having age range between 45 years to 65years
• Well controlled diabetes and hypertension
• ASA grade I & II

Exclusion criteria

• Patients with absolute contraindications of regional anesthesia,
• Deformity of vertebral column,
• Thyroid disorder,
• Psychiatric illness,
• Neurological diseases,
• Alcohol addiction,
• Smoking,
• Ischemic heart diseases and
• Not willing to participate

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

60 participants in 2 patient groups

Saddle group

Experimental group

Description:

After administration of 12mg of 0.5 % Hyperbaric Bupivacaine intrathecally, Patient is advised to remain in Sitting position for the next 5minutes and then take supine position

Treatment:

Drug: 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine

Spinal group

Active Comparator group

Description:

After administration of 12mg of 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine intrathecally, Patient is advised to take Supine position immediately.

Treatment:

Drug: 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine