ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Tolerance of PICC Line Versus Implanted Port for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer (EPIC)

C

Centre Henri Becquerel

Status and phase

Unknown
Phase 2

Conditions

Early Stage Breast Carcinoma

Treatments

Device: Use of a PICC line for chemo administration (PowerPICC SOLO²)
Device: implanted port for chemo administration (X-port isp)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02095743
CHB 13-01

Details and patient eligibility

About

Adjuvant chemotherapy is frequently proposed to patients presenting early breast cancer, in case of high risk of recurrence (large tumors, node involvement, high grade...). Due to its toxicity toward veins, chemotherapy must be administered through a central venous device. Today, one can use either an implanted port or a PICC line (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter). A PICC line is easier to implant and to explant, but has to be flushed every week and may impact daily life (no swimming, some clothes may not fit). On the other hand, a port is subcutaneous and lets patients lead a normal life, but its implant and explant require a cutaneous incision with possible complications (bleeding, pain, infection). For both venous devices, complications such as thrombosis or infection may happen. Published data comparing the two devices are heterogeneous and do not often distinguish patients treated for different diseases at various stages. Empirically in daily practice, for long term use (>6 months) a port is usually preferred, whereas for short-term treatments (<6 weeks) a PICC line is used. In the case of Her2 negative early breast cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy usually lasts 4 to 5 months. There is no scientific evidence for preferring one device to the other for these patients.

The aim of this study is to prospectively compare the patients' satisfaction and tolerance of each of the two devices.

Full description

The intravenous device will be randomly attributed. The adjuvant chemotherapy regimen will be selected according the standards of the center ( 6 cycles of FEC100 or 3 cycles of FEC100 then 3 cycles of Taxotere (docetaxel). The patient will be followed as per center's standards and visits (prior, during and after every drug administration, then monthly for six months). All Adverse Events will be reported.

Enrollment

256 estimated patients

Sex

Female

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Women age > 18
  • Documented breast cancer
  • No Her2 overexpression
  • Patients operated with curative intent (no distant metastasis at diagnosis)
  • Patients undergoing an adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of 3 courses of FEC 100 (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin 100mg/m² and cyclophosphamide ) followed by 3 courses of Taxotere, or 6FEC100 (according to CHB refencial for localised breast cancer treatment).
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Bilateral axillary node dissection
  • History of bilateral upper thoracic irradiation
  • Cutaneous disease (eczema, scleroderma, infection...) at catheter insertion site (arm or upper thorax)
  • Recent thrombosis of the upper body
  • Therapeutic anticoagulation
  • Tracheotomy
  • Treatment for bacteriemia in process
  • Altered hemostasis: INR > 1.5 ; APTT > 1.5 , platelets < 60 G/l
  • Renal failure with creatinine clearance < 60mL/min
  • Involvement in another trial
  • Contraindication to chemotherapy by FEC 100 or taxotere
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Protected major patient (under guardianship).
  • Psychosocial disorders : decompensated mental disorders, no social security coverage, patient who does not speak french

Trial design

Primary purpose

Supportive Care

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

256 participants in 2 patient groups

PICC line
Experimental group
Description:
Use of a PICC line for chemo administration (PowerPICC SOLO²)
Treatment:
Device: Use of a PICC line for chemo administration (PowerPICC SOLO²)
Implanted Port
Active Comparator group
Description:
Use of an implanted port for chemo administration
Treatment:
Device: implanted port for chemo administration (X-port isp)
Device: Use of a PICC line for chemo administration (PowerPICC SOLO²)

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems