ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Total Versus Subtotal Hysterectomy:a Randomised, Prospective Multicentre Study of the Effect on Urinary, Sexual and Bowel Function

S

St George's Healthcare NHS Trust

Status

Completed

Conditions

Hysterectomy

Treatments

Procedure: Total abdominal hysterectomy
Procedure: Subtotal abdominal hysterectomy

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT00750035
95.59.14

Details and patient eligibility

About

Background

It is uncertain whether subtotal abdominal hysterectomy results in better bladder, bowel, or sexual function than total abdominal hysterectomy.

Methods

The investigators conducted a randomized, double-blind trial comparing total and subtotal abdominal hysterectomy in 279 women referred for hysterectomy because of benign disease; most of the women were premenopausal. The main outcomes were measures of bladder, bowel, and sexual function at 12 months. The investigators also evaluated postoperative complications.

Enrollment

279 patients

Sex

Female

Ages

18 to 60 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Women having abdominal hysterectomy for benign conditions of the uterus

Exclusion criteria

  • Suspected cancer
  • A body weight that exceeded 100 kg
  • Previous pelvic surgery
  • Known endometriosis
  • Abnormal cervical smears,
  • Symptomatic uterine prolapse
  • Symptomatic urinary incontinence

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

279 participants in 2 patient groups

1
Experimental group
Description:
total abdominal hysterectomy and
Treatment:
Procedure: Total abdominal hysterectomy
2
Experimental group
Description:
Subtotal hysterectomy
Treatment:
Procedure: Subtotal abdominal hysterectomy

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems