Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
This is a prospective randomized study comparing tourniquet use versus a dual-flow arthroscopy sheath in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery.
The ACL is largely responsible for knee stability and contributes to central pivot with the posterior cruciate ligament. ACL rupture is associated with a violent twisting motion of the knee, which is usually irreparable without surgical intervention.
ACL reconstruction via arthroscopy is the gold standard treatment for young, active patients with knee instability. Reconstruction is commonly performed using a thigh tourniquet to improve intraoperative visibility, reduce bleeding, and shorten procedure time. However, numerous studies associate tourniquet use with an increased risk of postoperative complications such as increased pain, muscle injury, postoperative bleeding, and deep vein thrombosis. Therefore, it seems relevant to conduct further investigations into the benefits of new methods to replace tourniquet. In this context, the dual-flow arthroscopy sheath could improve postoperative recovery after ACL reconstruction and could limit the risk of complications, thus improving ambulatory care for patients.
This study propose to compare two groups of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction: those operated on with a tourniquet versus those operated on using the dual-flow arthroscopy sheath.
Full description
Initial assessments will be conducted preoperatively. The follow-up examination will take place during the first 7 days following surgery and then at 21 days (D21), 45 days (D45), and 5 months postoperatively.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
128 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Magali CESANA; Steven LAUJAC
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal