ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Tow Maxillary Hybrid Expanders Screw Supported Versus Lateral Angulated One; a Prospective Randomized Clinical Study

A

Al-Azhar University

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Cross Bite

Treatments

Device: hybrid expanders

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05193513
628/3133

Details and patient eligibility

About

in this study i will use to different designs of t maxillary hybrid expanders that consists of HYREX supported with tow miniscrews to treat the collapsed maxilla in Yonge adolescents

Full description

the maxilla is expanded by tow diffrent designs of maxillary hybrid expanders

Enrollment

20 patients

Sex

All

Ages

12 to 18 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Medically free male or female patients
  2. Patients that necessitated maxillary expansion due to constricted maxillary arch shown by a unilateral or bilateral posterior crossbite.
  3. The patient should have no missing teeth except third molars.
  4. Age ranged from 12 to 18 years old.
  5. The patient should have a good gingival condition.
  6. The patient should have a good periodontal condition.

Exclusion criteria

1-hisory of previous orthodontic treatment. 2- Lack of cooperation. 3- Mental problems. 4- Skeletal open bite. 5- TMJ problem.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

20 participants in 2 patient groups

group (1)
Experimental group
Description:
tow perpendicular miniscrews supported hybrid expanders
Treatment:
Device: hybrid expanders
group (2)
Experimental group
Description:
tow angulated miniscrews supported hybrid expanders
Treatment:
Device: hybrid expanders

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems