ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Transarterial Ethanol Ablation (TEA) Versus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolisation (TACE) for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The Chinese University of Hong Kong logo

The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 3

Conditions

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Treatments

Procedure: TEA with LEM
Procedure: TACE

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

The current randomized controlled trial comparing LEM and TACE aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LEM as compared to TACE for treating patients with unresectable HCC.

Full description

The standard loco-regional treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma is transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, The drawback of conventional chemoembolization (TACE) for liver cancer is that it cannot effectively embolize portal venules supplying the tumors, therefore chemoembolization is difficult to completely eradicate the tumor. Usually multiple treatments are required and tumor recurrences are common.

Transarterial Ethanol Ablation (LEM) can potentially provide a better treatment outcome with fewer treatment sessions. Preliminary results from a clinical study showed that the complication rate is reduced while survival rate may be improved. This study aims to compare survival duration and response rate between the treatments TACE and LEM.

Enrollment

98 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Patient factor

  • Age > 18
  • Child-Pugh A or B cirrhosis
  • ECOG performance status Grade 2 or below
  • No serious concurrent medical illness
  • No prior treatment (including surgery) for HCC

Tumor factor

  • Histologically or cytologically proven HCC (an alphafetoprotein level > 500 ug/ml in the presence of radiological findings suggestive of HCC in a patient with chronic HBV or HCV infection can be considered eligible at investigator's discretion)
  • Unresectable and locally advanced disease without extra-hepatic disease
  • Massive expansive or nodular tumor morphology with measurable lesion on CT
  • Size of largest tumor <= 15cm in largest dimension
  • Number of main tumor <= 5, excluding associated small satellite lesions.

Exclusion criteria

Patient factor

  • History of prior malignancy except skin cancer
  • History of significant concurrent medical illness such as ischemic heart disease or heart failure
  • History of acute tumor rupture
  • Serum creatinine level > 180 umol/L
  • Presence of biliary obstruction not amenable to percutaneous drainage
  • Child-Pugh C cirrhosis

Evidence of poor liver function

  • History of hepatic encephalopathy, or
  • Intractable ascites not controllable by medical therapy, or
  • History of variceal bleeding within last 3 months, or
  • Serum total bilirubin level > 50 umol/L, or
  • Serum albumin level < 28g/L, or
  • INR > 1.3

Tumor factor

  • Presence of extrahepatic metastasis
  • Predominantly infiltrative lesion
  • Diffuse tumor morphology with extensive lesions involving both lobes.

Vascular complications

  • Hepatic artery thrombosis, or
  • Partial or complete thrombosis of the main portal vein, or
  • Tumor invasion of portal branch of contralateral lobe, or
  • Hepatic vein tumor thrombus, or
  • Significant arterioportal shunt not amenable to shunt blockage, or
  • Significant arteriovenous shunt not amenable to shunt blockage

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

98 participants in 2 patient groups

1
Experimental group
Description:
TEA with LEM
Treatment:
Procedure: TEA with LEM
2
Active Comparator group
Description:
TACE
Treatment:
Procedure: TACE

Trial contacts and locations

3

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems