Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study aims to investigate the efficacy of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) combined with linguistic training for patients with chronic post-stroke aphasia. Thirteen patients will participate in a randomized crossover clinical trial. Their naming ability will be assessed before and after two-weeks of therapy (with 16 days of washout) supported by either 75Hz tACS or sham stimulation. The stimulated cortical area will be selected individually based on the results of functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Full description
Aphasia remains one of the most challenging long-term disabilities after stroke. Neuromodulation methods, such as transcranial electrical stimulation, may induce synaptic neuroplasticity processes and facilitate language restoration. Specifically, transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) may influence intrinsic cortical oscillations and GABA(A) inhibition.
This randomized, triple-blind, within-subject crossover pilot study aims to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of tACS as an adjunct technique in the therapy of adults with chronic post-stroke aphasia.
Participants (>6 months post-stroke) will undergo 20 therapeutic sessions consisting of language training (with a focus on naming ability) combined with 75 Hz tACS over selected cortical areas. Stimulation targets will be identified individually prior to the first intervention session using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during a naming task, selecting regions with the highest BOLD signal.
Participants will receive 10 sessions of active tACS and 10 sessions of sham stimulation in randomized order. Each intervention phase will last 2 weeks, resulting a total of 4 weeks of intervention. A 16-day washout period between the two intervention phases will be applied. The language training will include the vanishing cues method and a visual speech perception segment component to support language improvement and maintain a high level of participant motivation.
The primary outcome measure will be naming accuracy, assessed as the percentage of correctly named items in a picture-naming task (trained items), measured at three time points: immediately after completion of the intervention (last session), at 2-week, and 6-week follow-up.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
11 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal