ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Interferential Currents in Chronic Low Back Pain

F

Federal University of São Paulo

Status

Completed

Conditions

Chronic Low Back Pain

Treatments

Other: TENS
Other: Interferential currents

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT01017913
0143/06

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of the TENS and IFC in patients with non specific chronic low back pain.

Full description

Setting Outpatient physiotherapy department in university (Cesumar)

Participants A hundred and fifty patients with non specific chronic low back pain with or without radicular pain.

Interventions The patients were randomly divided into three groups: 1) TENS; 2) IFC; e 3) Control. Ten sessions of electrotherapy for groups 1 and 2, while the patients of the Control group stayed without any treatment in the same period

Main Outcome Measures Intensity of the pain through the Visual Analogue Scale and McGill Pain Questionnaire; specific functional disability by Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire; Analgesic period (hours); and the medication consumption

Statistic Analysis All data were analyzed using Statistica version 7 and SAS version 9.1. Baseline characteristics were compared using the Shapiro-Wilks test for continuous variables and then analysis of variance for measuring independent data. The characteristics of the patients who finished the treatment were compared with those of the lost patients, using one-way ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Enrollment

150 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 65 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals who had had low back pain for less than three months

Exclusion criteria

  • Individuals who were receiving treatment for their pain with another method at the same time, except for medicines;
  • Pregnant women;
  • Patients who had undergone vertebral column surgery (less than three months before the time of this study);
  • Individuals with contraindications against electrotherapy, such as skin lesions, abnormal sensitivity, infectious and blood diseases, heart pacemakers or inability to answer questionnaires;
  • Patients with fibromyalgia;
  • Individuals with psychiatric problems;
  • Individuals who refused to participate or were unwilling to follow a protocol lasting for two weeks.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

150 participants in 3 patient groups

Electrotherapy equipment
Active Comparator group
Description:
The TENS equipment was calibrated on 20 hertz frequency, and a pulse width of 330 ms with two channels.
Treatment:
Other: Interferential currents
Other: TENS
electrotherapy equipment
Active Comparator group
Description:
The CI was adjusted with 4000 HZ bases frequency, modulation frequency range 20 HZ, ∆F10 HZ, slope 1/1 and quadripolar manner.
Treatment:
Other: Interferential currents
Other: TENS
Control
No Intervention group
Description:
The patients of the Control group stayed without any treatment in the same period
Treatment:
Other: TENS

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems