Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
Transepithelial CXL (performed without epithelial removal) seem to have similar clinical effect on keratoconic eyes compared to the standard CXL (which includes epithelial removal). The current study attempts to prove that hypothesis.
A prospective, controlled, randomized, contralateral trial, will involve one eye of the patient to be treated with transepithelial CXL, while the control eye will be treated with the standard CXL. Totally 20 patients (age >18 and <40 years) referred by an ophthalmologist to the eye department of the University Hospital North Norway for CXL treatment of bilateral progressive keratoconus, will be recruited.
Full description
CXL appears to hinder the development of keratoconus by strengthening the cross-bindings in the corneal stroma with a resultant increase in corneal biomechanical strength of up to 300%. The method was introduced in the mid-nineties and has been approved for use in the EU countries since 2007. Standard treatment protocol, involving the removal of the corneal epithelium before the Riboflavin application, has been used. In order to avoid potential complications following removal of the epithelium (infection, delayed healing, scar formation, as well as discomfort and pain), a modified procedure where the epithelium is kept intact, so called transepithelial CXL, has been suggested. According to the preliminary results of the published retrospective studies, no significant difference in the clinical effect between the standard CXL with epithelial removal and the transepithelial CXL was found.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
20 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal