ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Transobturator Urethral Sling Placement With an Autologous Rectus Facia

A

Ankara Training and Research Hospital

Status

Completed

Conditions

Stress Urinary Incontinence
Surgery--Complications

Treatments

Procedure: Mid-urethral sling placement using autologous rectus fascia
Procedure: Mid-urethral sling placement using synthetic mesh

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

The investigators aimed to evaluate outcomes of transobturator urethral sling placement using autologous rectus fascia for female stress urinary incontinence at perioperatively and at 2-year follow-up.

Full description

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is very common condition in middle-aged women, and can affect quality of life. Some clinical trials reported that the lifetime risk of a woman undergoing surgery for SUI is increase in up to 15%. The midurethral synthetic sling is the most common surgery performed for female SUI. This procedure has high efficacy and low perioperative morbidity.

Although many clinical trials have demonstrated that synthetic mid-urethral slings are safe, effective and recommended by several guidelines (e.g. Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction/American Urogynecologic Society and American Urologic Association), the safety and efficacy of surgery for SUI using mesh devices has been questioned by a community of patients and clinicians. After Food and Drug Administration notification on mesh use in pelvic surgery, many patients and providers begin to search of different surgery without synthetic mesh alternatives in SUI. Recently, female patients in England formed the campaign group "Sling the Mesh" to protest the synthetic mesh.

Several options such as the autologous pubovaginal sling, biologic grafts, or urethral bulking agent injection have some problems related to morbidity or efficacy. The autologous pubovaginal urethral sling is associated with a higher risk of postoperative voiding dysfunction.

The investigators aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of an autologous transobturator urethral sling to avoid the related problems of synthetic mesh placement and the increased rate of voiding dysfunction with pubovaginal sling placement.

Enrollment

35 patients

Sex

Female

Ages

18 to 75 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • female patients that underwent mid-urethral sling placement

Exclusion criteria

  • active urinary infection
  • neurologic disorders
  • malignancies
  • history of radiotherapy

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

35 participants in 2 patient groups

autologous fascia
Active Comparator group
Description:
Patients who underwent a transobturator sling placement using autologous rectus fascia
Treatment:
Procedure: Mid-urethral sling placement using autologous rectus fascia
synthetic mesh
Active Comparator group
Description:
Patients who underwent a transobturator sling placement using synthetic mesh
Treatment:
Procedure: Mid-urethral sling placement using synthetic mesh

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems