Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of transthoracic cryoablation to transbronchial cryoablation in the treatment of early-stage peripheral lung cancer.
Full description
Ablation therapy has been widely used in the treatment of peripheral lung cancer. Among various ablation techniques, cryoablation has been demonstrated to be therapeutic efficacy with several advantages, including high safety, clear ablation borders, and minimal local pain. With the development of navigational bronchoscopy, pilot study on transbronchial cryoablation for peripheral lung cancer has proved its efficacy and safety, but there is a lack of prospective randomized controlled trials to verify its near-term as well as long-term efficacy and safety. This study was designed as a prospective, randomized controlled, multicenter clinical trial. A total of 110 participants will be randomly assigned to either the transbronchial group or the transthoracic group in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint is the complete ablation rate at 12 months post-ablation. Secondary endpoints include technical success rate, complete ablation rate at 6 months post-ablation, local control rate at 1, 2 and 3 years post-ablation, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
110 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Jiayuan Sun, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal