ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Spinal Morphine After Caesarean Section : A Comparison Study

M

Mbarara University of Science and Technology

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 3

Conditions

Pregnancy, Ceasarian Section, Anaesthesia

Treatments

Drug: Intrathecal morphine

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03263689
MUST/19/08-14

Details and patient eligibility

About

Many counties in sub-Saharan Africa have very limited post-operative nursing capacity, and relatively little data have been published about post-operative maternal pain control in these settings. Cesarean section is the most common type of major operation at our institution, Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH), in south-western Uganda.Nursing ward staffing capacity is low, with much basic nursing care provided by families and friends of patients. The investigators conducted a study to examine the impact of ITM versus TAP block in a setting of limited formal nursing oversight.

Full description

Intrathecal morphine (ITM), administered as a part of spinal anesthesia for caesarian section, can produce significant post-operative analgesia for several hours. The Tranversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block can also provide prolonged post-operative pain control. A small number of published studies comparing analgesic outcomes after cesarian section with ITM or TAP block have reported variable results.Moreover, these studies have been conducted in countries with extensive post-operative nursing care.

Many counties in sub-Saharan Africa have very limited post-operative nursing capacity, and relatively little data have been published about post-operative maternal pain control in these settings. Cesarean section is the most common type of major operation at our institution, Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH), in south-western Uganda.Nursing ward staffing capacity is low, with much basic nursing care provided by families and friends of patients. The investigators conducted a study to examine the impact of ITM versus TAP block in a setting of limited formal nursing oversight.

Enrollment

130 patients

Sex

Female

Ages

18 to 45 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Women between the age of 18-45;
  2. Greater than 50 kilograms in weight;
  3. Routine spinal anesthetic without sedation for an uncomplicated caesarean delivery via a low, transverse abdominal incision (Pfannenstiel);
  4. In good health with no major medical problems including gastric ulcers, liver or renal dysfunction
  5. Able to communicate freely with a provided non-family member interpreter fluent in the patient's language so that informed consent may be obtained

Exclusion criteria

  1. Patients with allergies to bupivacaine, paracetamol, or diclofenac;
  2. Patients undergoing a surgical approach is other than a low, transverse abdominal incision (Pfannenstiel);
  3. Pre-eclampsia, uterine rupture, placental abruption with this pregnancy;
  4. Prior complicated abdominal surgery;
  5. Medical history of gastric ulcers, liver or kidney dysfunction; and
  6. Patient refusal to be involved in the study. Failure to attain informed consent from the patient due to age or level of consciousness
  7. Voluntary or involuntary withdraw from the study
  8. Referral to another health centre or Hospital for further management.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

130 participants in 2 patient groups

Intervention
Experimental group
Description:
ITM group were given 1. Local anaesthesia (plain hyperbaric bupivacaine 10mgs) intrathecally during the spinal anaesthesia 2. 100 micrograms of preservative-free morphine.
Treatment:
Drug: Intrathecal morphine
Control
Active Comparator group
Description:
TAP group were given only local anaesthesia (plain hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 mgs) during the spinal anaesthesia.
Treatment:
Drug: Intrathecal morphine

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems