ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Trapeziometacarpal Prosthesis vs. Resection-Interposition Arthroplasty

M

Medical University of Graz

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Arthropathy of Hand

Treatments

Procedure: Epping resection arthroplasty
Procedure: CMC I prosthesis

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
Industry

Identifiers

NCT05267964
26-543 ex 13/14

Details and patient eligibility

About

Rhizarthrosis is a frequently occurring pathology leading to severe limitations in daily life due to pain and loss of function. Good clinical results have been reported for some carpometacarpal (CMC) joint prosthesis designs, but high failure rates due to loosening and dislocation must be considered. The study aim was to investigate a new, double mobility CMC-prosthesis design with special focus on (1) the functional outcome and (2) patient quality of life (QOL)

Full description

The Epping resection-suspension arthroplasty procedure was described in 1983 to address the proximal migration of the first ray while providing pain free grip strength without any implants. It has shown rather good functional outcome and pain relief. A reduction in thumb opposition strength of 27% compared to the contralateral side and intermittent pain in physical activity is reported, however. Further, studies comparing trapeziectomy and trapeziectomy with tendon interposition recommend trapeziectomy due to the simple technique and comparable outcome.

Endoprosthesis of the first carpometacarpal (CMC) joint represents a different treatment strategy aiming at an exact reconstruction of the joint geometry. Some studies report excellent functional outcome and pain relief. However, there are some prosthesis designs (cemented and uncemented) with high rates of loosening, luxation and poor subjective results. To address these issues, a prosthesis was designed combining a cylindric, double mobility cup and a hydroxyapatite covered stem and cup available in different sizes. The aim of this study was to compare this new prosthesis design to the Epping arthroplasty as the current standard in the investigator's institution regarding (1) the functional outcome with special focus on mobility and strength and (2) patient quality of life (QOL) and pain relief.

Note: The registration of this trial on Clinicaltrials.gov was carried out retrospectively after primary completion of the study.

Enrollment

100 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • symptomatic rhizarthrosis grade 2 and 3 according to Eaton's classification,
  • failed conservative treatment prior to surgery,
  • written informed consent to the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • scaphotrapezotrapezoidal (STT) arthrosis,
  • former CMC joint surgery,
  • patients under custodianship.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

100 participants in 2 patient groups

Epping resection arthroplasty
Active Comparator group
Description:
During the Epping resection-suspension arthroplasty the trapeziectomy is performed, the flexor carpi radialis tendon is divided into two parts and one of these is stripped and cut proximally. To prevent shortening of the first ray with following loss of strength, this tendon strip is pulled through a drill hole in the base of the 1st metacarpal from ulnar palmar to radial dorsal. The rest of the tendon strip is sutured to a roll replacing the os trapezium.
Treatment:
Procedure: Epping resection arthroplasty
CMC I prosthesis group
Active Comparator group
Description:
During implantation of the prosthesis the CMC joint is opened and 3 mm of the metacarpal base as well as osteophytes are resected. Following the release of the trapezium the first metacarpal and the trapezium are prepared for the prosthesis by broaching and drilling. After the test-implants have shown satisfying joint tension and anatomic conditions, the HA coated stem and cup are pressfit inserted in the appropriate size followed by the modular head.
Treatment:
Procedure: CMC I prosthesis

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems