Traumatic Anal Sphincteric Injury Immediate vs Delayed Repair

Assiut University

Status: Unknown

Conditions: Traumatic Anal Sphincteric Injury,Immediate vs Delayed Repair

Study type: Observational

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT05234931

anal sphincteric injury

Details and patient eligibility

About

comparison between immediate and delayed repair regarding the need for another technique ,pain score or repositioning and need for repair. We aim to evaluate the effects of immediate and delayed repair regarding the morbidity and mortalit

• Objective 1: to assess the operative time and surgical field of both choices.
• Objective 2: to estimate post-operative pain using pain score, to measure hospital stay and to assess short -term post-operative complications

Full description

Many different secondary procedures have been described in an attempt to restore continence. These may be classified into indirect methods, where the divided sphincter is left unrepaired, and direct methods to repair the sphincter itself. Indirect techniques include construction of circum anal slings of striated muscle or fascia external sphincter reefing procedures" and the use of striated muscle grafts. Direct methods involve identification, mobilization, and suture of the ends of the divided sphincter. Thearliest 'attempts employed an end-to-end

Enrollment: 30 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 75 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

1. both sex
2. • Traumatic Patients Who Presented by anal Sphincteric Injury
3. accept to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient who arrest immediately when arrived trauma unit
2. Obstetric Patients Who Presented by anal Sphincteric Injury