Treat-to-target by Email During Urate-lowering Therapy in Gout (GOUTEmail)

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Status: Active, not recruiting

Conditions: Posology Adjustment; Hyperuricemia; Inflammatory Rheumatism; Gout

Treatments: Other: Usual follow-up; Other: Cleanweb electronic messaging ePro

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT04733079

APHP180167

Details and patient eligibility

About

Gout is secondary to urate crystal deposition after chronic elevation of serum urate level (SUL). Long-term lowering SUL below 360 µmol/L allows dissolution of deposited crystals and disease cure. There is currently a paradoxical observation: while urate-lowering therapy (ULT) is available and efficient there is an increase of gout prevalence and severity. The apparent failure of ULT in gout management is due to several causes including unadjusted dosage, no SUL verification, irregular follow-up and low treatment compliance.

In contrast, a nurse-led treat-to-target (T2T) strategy with regular adaptations of ULT until reaching SUL target allows gout cure in more than 90% of patients. We hypothesize that an electronic messaging-led T2T strategy will allow obtaining similar results.

The aim of this study is to demonstrate that email-led T2T strategy during ULT is superior to usual care.

Full description

The study will include 204 gouty patients without ULT or with ineffective ULT. This is a multicenter and randomized study (e-mail follow-up vs usual follow-up groups).

This study will include the following visits:

• Selection/inclusion visit (V0):

  • If available biological data (leucocyte count, hemoglobin level, creatininemia and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), SUL) were assessed during the last month, , included patient will be randomized at the end of the consultation to follow either an email-led T2T strategy or usual ULT care.
  • In the absence of biological results, the patient will be reviewed within the month with blood analysis and then randomized.

• Follow-up visits: consultations will be carried out according to the usual care of the referring physician.

• Visit M12 end of research: clinical evaluation of gout, demographic characteristics, medication, type and dose of ULT, blood analysis (serum creatinine level, eGFR, SUL).

The study ends after the M12 consultation. The total duration of participation in the study is 12 months.

Enrollment: 204 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18+ years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Adults aged over 18 years old
• Gout confirmed by identification of urate crystals by joint fluid or tophus analysis or by ultrasound of the affected joint or
• Gout according to Nijmegen criteria (presence of a score ≥ 8/13) depending on the following items:

Man (2 pts) Previous crisis (2 pts) Involvement of first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP1) (2.5 pts) Maximum pain within 24 hours (0.5pt) Redness (1 pt) HTA or cardiovascular disease (1.5 pts) SUL > 360 μmol/l during the crisis (3.5 pts)

• Patients without ULT or with an ineffective ULT defined by an SUL > 360 μmol/l in intercritical pahse
• Patients who routinely use e-mail

Exclusion criteria

• Participating in another trial including the administration of a drug
• Patients treated with azathioprine
• Patients intolerant to hypouricemic treatments
• Unable to use the internet
• Difficulty understanding French
• Illiteracy
• Pregnant womenor breastfeeding mothers (see PHC article L.1121-5)
• Persons deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, persons receiving psychiatric care under Sections L. 3212-1 and L. 3213-1 and persons admitted to a health or social institution for purposes other than research (see CSP Article L.1121-6)
• Major persons subject to a measure of legal protection or unseeding to express consent (see PHC Article L.1121-8)
• Persons not affiliated to a social security plan or beneficiaries of such a plan (see PHC Article L.1121-8-1)

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

204 participants in 2 patient groups

E-mail follow-up group

Experimental group

Description:

Email-led treat-to-target strategy with regular adaptation of ULT via electronic messaging

Treatment:

Other: Cleanweb electronic messaging ePro

Usual follow-up group

Active Comparator group

Description:

Adaptation and follow-up of ULT according to referring physician's habits

Treatment:

Other: Usual follow-up