Treating Cognitive Deficits in Spinal Cord Injury

James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Status: Completed

Conditions: Cerebral Blood Flow; Cognitive Function; Spinal Cord Injury; Blood Pressure

Treatments: Other: mSMT Control; Other: SPT Control; Other: SPT; Other: mSMT

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other; Other U.S. Federal agency

Identifiers

NCT03037879

WEC-16-059

Details and patient eligibility

About

Multiple studies in the spinal cord injury (SCI) population have documented deficits in learning and memory (LM) and processing speed (PS) that adversely impact daily life and the ability to benefit from rehabilitation. The investigators have previously attributed the cognitive deficits demonstrated in the SCI population to low blood pressure (BP) and cerebral blood flow (CBF) and are currently conducting a study to determine the effect of a 30-day elevation in BP (using midodrine hydrochloride - an alpha agonist) on CBF and cognitive performance compared to placebo in hypotensive individuals with SCI. In addition, the investigators believe that cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) may improve cognition independent of changes in BP and CBF in individuals with SCI. The current randomized clinical trial (RCT) will examine the efficacy of 2 treatment protocols shown to be effective in improving cognitive performance in other neurologically impaired populations for use in persons with SCI demonstrating (1) LM impairment and/or (2) PS impairment on objective measures of cognitive functioning during a complete Neuropsychological assessment. Two methods of outcome assessment will be used to examine treatment impact: (1) a traditional Neuropsychological assessment (NP) and (2) an assessment of global functioning (AGF) composed of broader outcome measures that examine the impact of the treatment on everyday life activities. In this way, the investigators will be able to objectively evaluate the presence or absence of changes in memory performance through a NP assessment, while also evaluating the impact of this treatment protocol on everyday life through the AGF. While most studies evaluating the efficacy of cognitive retraining usually employ a pre- and post-training evaluation, such evaluations have been criticized for their lack of ecological validity (i.e., real world generalizability). The present design allows the assessment of the efficacy of these treatment techniques within an SCI population using traditional measures, as well as the assessment of the impact that treatment has on everyday life. The investigators will additionally evaluate the long-term efficacy by including a 6-month post-treatment follow-up. Few studies examine long-term effects, but given the time, labor and expense involved, it is critical to demonstrate long-term efficacy.

Full description

104 individuals with SCI will be recruited for eligibility to participate in the study. Participants will be randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=26 per group) story memory technique (mSMT), mSMT control, speed of processing training (SPT) and SPT control.

The study involves 14 visits spread over 8 months. A screening visit, lasting approximately 1 hour. 3 testing sessions lasting 3-4 hours each (Baseline, Immediate and Long-term follow-ups), and 10 intervention sessions that will last approximately 45 minutes each.

Screening: Prior to enrollment in the study protocol, all potential subjects will undergo cognitive screening to determine eligibility for participation.

Baseline: After passing screening, subjects will be scheduled for the baseline evaluation comprised of a cardiovascular/cerebrovascular assessment and cognitive evaluation.

Intervention: Subjects will undergo 10 sessions of training in one of the 4 randomized groups.

Immediate Follow-up Assessment: Subjects will undergo a repeat of the baseline assessments upon completion of the intervention protocol to document changes in PS, LM, BP and CBF following treatment.

Long-Term Follow-up: Subjects will be asked to return to the laboratory 6 months following the intervention for evaluation of the maintenance of the treatment effect over time. Baseline and Immediate follow-up measures of PS, LM, BP and CBF will be documented.

Enrollment: 10 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 75 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Primary language is English;
• Level of Spinal Cord Injury between C1 and T12;
• Non-ambulatory (wheelchair dependent);
• American Spinal Injury Association (AISA) grade A, B or C;
• Spinal Cord Injury occurred more than 1 year ago.

Exclusion criteria

• Acute illness or infection.
• Documented history of:
• Controlled or uncontrolled Hypertension or Diabetes Mellitus;
• Stroke;
• Multiple sclerosis & Parkinson's disease;
• Psychiatric disorders (post-traumatic stress disorder, schizophrenia; bipolar disorder);
• Pre-screen MoCA score of < 22 (to rule out dementia);
• Vision impaired - more than 20/60 in worst eye (with prescription eyewear).
• Currently prescribed steroids, benzodiazepines, or neuroleptics.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Double Blind

---

10 participants in 4 patient groups

SPT

Experimental group

Description:

Speed of Processing Training

Treatment:

Other: SPT

Control Group SPT

Active Comparator group

Description:

Control group to SPT treatment group

Treatment:

Other: SPT Control

mSMT

Experimental group

Description:

Story Memory Technique

Treatment:

Other: mSMT

Control mSMT

Active Comparator group

Description:

Control group to mSMT treatment group

Treatment:

Other: mSMT Control