ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Treatment for Adolescents With Deliberate Self Harm

University of Oslo (UIO) logo

University of Oslo (UIO)

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 2

Conditions

Intentional Self Harm

Treatments

Behavioral: Dialectical behavioral therapy for adolescents (DBT-A)
Behavioral: Treatment as usual

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT00675129
SHDIR-04-627

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficiency of dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) in treatment of adolescents with deliberate self harm compared to Enhanced Usual Care (EUC). Eighty patients in the age of 12-18 yrs old will be included in the study. The main inclusion criterion is repetitive deliberate self-harm. The patients will receive 16 weeks treatment in outpatient clinics in Oslo, after having been randomized to DBT or EUC. They will be assessed on five different time-points: baseline (before starting treatment), 6 weeks (after start of treatment), 12 weeks, 16 weeks and 68 weeks.

The main study hypothesis is:

  • DBT will be significantly more effective in treatment of self-harm behavior, as measured/indicated by reduction in number of self-harm episodes with or without intent to die, as well as reduction of number of emergency room visits.
  • It is also hypothesized that DBT will significantly reduce the level of suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms compared to EUC.

Full description

Power analysis:

Exact data on the repetition of self-harm over 16-20 week and 12 months observation periods for adolescents in outpatient psychiatric treatment are not available. Building on previous clinical studies and RCT studies in adults receiving DBT, we anticipate that the 16 week repetition rate will be 50% for adolescents who receive EUC and 25% for adolescents who receive DBT. With an alpha error level of 5% 60 patients in each group is needed to provide 80% power with a two tailed test. We anticipate a drop out rate from research assessments of no more than 25%. To compensate for this attrition, it is calculated that 15 patients in each treatment group should be added, leading to a total number of 150 patients to be included in the trial. A more precise power analysis and determination of how many patients to include in the study will be based on data from the first 40 patients who have been included.

A power analysis conducted on the basis of the first 40 patients showed that:

  1. There had been no attrition from research assessments
  2. With an alpha error level of 5% 40 patients in each group is needed to provide 80% power with a two tailed test

A final number of patients to include was therefore fixed at 80.

Enrollment

77 patients

Sex

All

Ages

12 to 18 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • History of repeated deliberate self harm (last episode within last months)
  • Satisfies at least 2 criteria of DSM-IV Borderline Personality Disorder (as measured by SCID-II) in addition to the self-destructive criterion.

Or: Satisfies at least 1 criterion + 2 criteria scored below threshold (score 2) of DSM-IV Borderline Personality Disorder (as measured by SCID-II) in addition to the self-destructive criterion.

Exclusion criteria

  • Psychotic disorders
  • Anorexia Nervosa
  • Substance dependence disorder
  • Mental retardation (IQ less than 70)
  • Asperger syndrome/autism

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

77 participants in 2 patient groups

1
Experimental group
Description:
Dialectical behavioral therapy
Treatment:
Behavioral: Dialectical behavioral therapy for adolescents (DBT-A)
2
Active Comparator group
Description:
Enhanced Usual Care (standard care plus monitoring and patient safety protocol implemented)
Treatment:
Behavioral: Treatment as usual

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems