Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the incidence of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and/or neutropenic complications (febrile neutropenia, neutropenic infection) with two schedules of cabazitaxel (bi-weekly versus tri-weekly) plus prednisone in elderly men (≥ 65 years) with mCRPC previously treated with a docetaxel-containing regimen.
Full description
Randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial in mCRPC patients aged ≥ 65 years.
Number of subjects:
Total:170 to 200 (85 to 100 per arm)
Treatment:
Exploratory assessments:
CT-Scan (abdominal/pelvic/chest) or whole body MRI and Bone scan: at screening, every 3 months and EOT.
FACT-P questionnaire:at C1D1,each subsequent visit and EOT
Exploratory substudy Blood samples will be collected in France (4 or 6 sites) and the Netherlands (2 sites). Biomarker analysis will be conducted at the Urology and The Tumor Immunology Laboratory at Radboud UMC in NL.
Biomarker schedule Arm A (25mg/m2): Baseline - Week 6 - Week 12 - at progression Arm B (16mg/m2): Baseline - Week 6 - Week 12 - at progression Optional sample points are at C1D8.
Number of subjects: 50
Statistical analysis:
A sample size of 77 to 90 evaluable patients per arm will achieve 80% power to detect a 20% difference in G3 neutropenia incidence between the 2 arms. The incidence in group cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 q3w is assumed to be 32% and 12% on bi-weekly cabazitaxel arm. The test used is a two-sided Fisher's exact test at 0.05 significance level. Assuming 10% non-evaluable patients, 85 to 100 patients should be included in each arm for a total of 170 to 200.
Patients will be stratified according to G8 score (< 14 vs. ≥ 14), and age (< 70 vs. ≥ 70) before randomization.
Exploratory sub-study The trial is powered on a clinical endpoint, namely to detect a 20% difference in G3 nThe trial is powered on a clinical endpoint, namely to detect a 20% difference in G3 neutropenia incidence between arms (32% in arm A vs 12% arm B; power 80% with two-sided alpha of 5%, correcting for 10% non-evaluable patients (=17 patients).
From the 153 to 180 evaluable patients, we have 76 to 90 patients in each arm, of which we expect 40-60 evaluable patients for translational studies (calculations performed on 25 per arm).
In arm A, we expect 8 patients (32% of patients) with G3 neutropenia, and 17 patients that do not. In arm B, we expect 3 patients (12% of patients) with G3 neutropenia, and 22 patients that do not. For the MDSC analyses, we therefore will be comparing 11 patients with G3 neutropenia to 39 patients.
For all continuous variables, including all immune subpopulations present in blood, mean (sd) will be presented if the distribution seems to be symmetric and in case of a skewed distribution the median and IQR. For categorical data, number and percentage will be presented. For comparison of continuous data linear regression analyses or correlation (Spearman or Pearson) will used. For comparison of continuous data with categorical data logistic regression analysis will be used. For comparison of two sets of categorical data the chi-square test of Fisher's exact test will be utilized. For the radiological PFS analyses the estimates of the hazard ratio and corresponding 95% confidence interval will be tested using a Cox Proportional hazard model. For the overall survival, a stratified log-rank test will be used to compare between groups.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Patient aged ≥ 65 years with mCRPC previously treated with docetaxel
Medical or surgical castration with castrate level of testosterone (< 50 ng/dl) based on the EAU definition of castrate level of testosterone
Progressive disease according to PCWG2
Histologically proven prostate carcinoma
Health status allowing use of chemotherapy: G8 > 14; or G8 score ≤ 14 with geriatric assessment concluding to reversible impairment allowing use of chemotherapy
ECOG-PS 0, 1 or 2(ECOG-PS 2 should be related to prostate cancer)
Adequate hematologic, liver and renal functions:
Ongoing LHRH therapy at study entry
Signed informed consent
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
196 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal