Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
This study attempts to study a new ventilation mode in children with Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Despite decades of research, no intervention has brought about a significant decrease in ARDS mortality. Moreover, most of the studies are adult-based and have been extrapolated to children. Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) mode is hypothesized to be superior in terms of lower need for sedation, shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, etc. It is unique and the first worldwide randomized controlled trial on APRV mode in children.
We plan to recruit a minimum of 50 children aged (1 month-12 years) in each group. The study is to be conducted at the Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh between March 2014 to March 2016. This trial would recruit children with respiratory failure and early ARDS and, randomize them to receive either conventional ventilation or the APRV mode. Rest of the supportive care has also been protocolized so that both groups receive treatment as per the existing best practices in every aspect. The primary outcome being studied is the number of ventilator-free days. The secondary outcomes include length of PICU stay, hospital stay, organ-failure free days, 28 day & 3 month survival, biomarkers of lung injury (IL-6, IL-8, Angiopoeitin-2, soluble-ICAM-1, etc), functional status, Pulmonary function tests, etc. Funding request would be sent to the Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Assessing lung biomarkers like Interleukin-6 would assess the role of different modes of ventilation in acting as triggers for multi-organ dysfunction as well as for worsening lung injury. This pathbreaking research is likely to open up new avenues upon completion.
Full description
Study setting:
15-bedded pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a multi-specialty, tertiary referral and teaching hospital- the Advanced Pediatrics Centre (APC) in Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India Study period Recruitment: January 2014 to December 2016 Data Analysis: Jan 2017 to June 2017 Study design An open-labelled, parallel-arm, efficacy/feasibility randomized controlled trial Ethics approval Ethics approval has been obtained from the Institute Ethics Committee. The study has been registered with Clinical Trials Registry - India (CTRI) (ctri.nic.in). Informed consent will be obtained from the parents/legal guardian and the conversation would be recorded using a camera (audio-visual documentation of evidence).
Sample size estimation Assuming alpha error of 5% and power of 80% with non-inferiority limit of 4 days (Standard deviation of VFDs being 8.2 days in the conventional low tidal volume ventilation group in pilot trial), sample size was calculated to be 52 per group. As this is a safety and feasibility trial, an interim analysis would be done at 50% enrolment.
Enrolment Parents or legal guardians of children who satisfy the above eligibility criteria will be invited by the investigator to participate in the study. Parents are free not to participate, or to withdraw from the study at any point of time. All children, irrespective of their enrollment in the study, will receive standard pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) care as per the unit's existing protocol. An information sheet (in Hindi/ English) furnishing details of the study will be provided to the parents. Given the fact that all these children are sedated and on mechanical ventilation, obtaining assent would not be feasible in this study.
Randomization Sequence generation A computer-generated, unstratified, block randomization with variable block sizes will be performed to determine group allocation. A person not involved in the study will perform the random number allocation and prepare opaque, sealed envelopes containing the allocation.
Concealment allocation Each pre-sealed opaque envelope would be opened only after obtaining a written consent and audio-visual record of the same. As the randomization is done using a variable block size, and prepared by a statistician not directly involved in the study, there would be no way of predicting the random allocation, thus minimizing the risk of allocation bias.
Randomization implementation After parents provide informed consent, randomization would be done within the next one hour and child initiated on appropriate mode of ventilation. The supportive care for both the groups, would be as per the attached supplementary protocols
Intervention protocol:
The Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) intervention protocol has been designed based on the available APRV literature as of Dec 2013.
Start the child on APRV mode of ventilation with the following settings:
P HIGH would determine the degree of baseline lung inflation. A rough estimate can be obtained based on the plateau pressure requirements on the conventional mode of ventilation. Perform an inspiratory hold to ascertain the plateau pressures:
Alternatively, if P plateau cannot be measured, P HIGH can be set according to the following guide:
PaO2/ FiO2 ratio P High < 250 15-20 < 200 20-25 < 150 25-28
After initiating a particular P HIGH, a clinical assessment of lung volume needs to be followed with a chest radiograph to determine the degree of lung inflation (similar to setting of Mean airway pressure in High frequency oscillatory mode of ventilation). The child's P HIGH is adjusted to maintain optimal lung volume, without clinical or radiological evidence of hyperinflation: no signs of decreased cardiac output/ hypotension and/or the level of the diaphragm visible greater than the ninth rib.
Weaning from APRV would also be carried out in a structured, protocolized manner. The following strategies would be adopted:
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Children aged 1 month- 12 years, who are intubated and mechanically ventilated with the following criteria of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome:
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
52 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal