ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Trial of Proton Versus Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy in Patients With Low and Inter-mediate Grade Chondrosarcoma of the Skull Base (CSP12C)

H

Heidelberg University

Status and phase

Unknown
Phase 3

Conditions

Chondrosarcoma

Treatments

Radiation: proton therapy
Radiation: carbon ion therapy

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT01182753
CS.P.12C

Details and patient eligibility

About

The study is a prospective randomised clinical phase III trial. Proton therapy is the gold standard in the treatment of low and intermediate grad chondrosarcomas of the skull base. However, high-LET beams such as carbon ions theoretically offer biologic advantages by enhanced biologic effectiveness in slow-growing tumors. Up until now it was impossible to compare two different particle therapies, i.e. proton and carbon ion therapy directly with each other. The aim of this study is to find out, whether the biological advantages of carbon ion therapy mentioned above can also be clinically confirmed.

Full description

The study is a prospective randomised clinical phase III trial. The trial will be carried out at Heidelberger Ionenstrahl-Therapie (HIT) centre as monocentric trial.

Proton therapy is the gold standard in the treatment of low and intermediate grad chondrosarcomas of the skull base. However, high-LET beams such as carbon ions theoretically offer biologic advantages by enhanced biologic effectiveness in slow-growing tumors. Up until now it was impossible to compare two different particle therapies, i.e. proton and carbon ion therapy directly with each other. The aim of this study is to find out, whether the biological advantages of carbon ion therapy mentioned above can also be clinically confirmed.

Patients with skull base chondrosarcomas will be randomised to either proton or carbon ion radiation therapy. As a standard, patients will undergo non-invasive, rigid immobilization and target volume definition will be carried out based on CT and MRI data. The biologically isoeffective target dose to the PTV in carbon ion treatment will be 60 Gy E ± 5% and 70 Gy E ± 5% (standard dose) in proton therapy respectively. The 5 year local-progression free survival (LPFS) rate will be analysed as primary end point. Overall survival, progression free and metastasis free survival, patterns of recurrence, local control rate and morbidity are the secondary end points. Plan quality is also a matter of interest.

Enrollment

154 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 80 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Karnofsky Performance Score ≥60%
  • Age >18 years and <80 years
  • Informed consent signed by the patient
  • Histological confirmation of low/ intermediate grade chondrosarcoma with infiltration of the skull base.

Exclusion criteria

  • Inability to understand the aims of the study, no informed consent
  • Prior RT of skull base region
  • Other malignancies with disease-free interval < 5 years (excepting pre-cancerous lesions)
  • Participation in another trial
  • Pregnancy
  • Simultaneous CHT or Immunotherapy.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

154 participants in 2 patient groups

A
Experimental group
Description:
Arm A (carbon ion therapy): Total dose to the PTV2 - 45 Gy E in 3 Gy E /d, 4 - 6 days a week, 15 fractions Total dose to the PTV1 - 60 Gy E ± 5%, further 4 - 6 fractions a 3 Gy E.
Treatment:
Radiation: carbon ion therapy
B
Active Comparator group
Description:
Arm B (proton therapy): Total dose to the PTV2 - 50 to 56 Gy E in 2 Gy E /d, 4 - 6 days a week, 25 - 28 fractions Total dose to the PTV1 - 70 Gy E ± 5%, further 6 - 10 fractions a 2 Gy E.
Treatment:
Radiation: proton therapy

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Juergen Debus, MD, PhD; Anna V. Nikoghosyan, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems