ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Trilogy Comparison Study - Adults

Philips logo

Philips

Status

Completed

Conditions

Respiratory Failure
Respiratory Insufficiency

Treatments

Device: Standard of Care
Device: Trilogy

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Industry

Identifiers

NCT00810498
MR-0609-TRI2-SS

Details and patient eligibility

About

The objective of this study (Part II) will be to compare the performance of the Trilogy device and a conventional ventilator (participant's current device). Both devices will be set to the participants' current mode and prescription settings.

Full description

A. Primary Hypothesis and end-point In patients with respiratory insufficiency, when compared to conventional ventilators, the Trilogy device achieves comparable level of gas exchange (measured as partial pressure of CO2 in arterial or venous blood)and SpO2 levels during various modes of ventilation.

B. Secondary Hypothesis and end-points In patients with respiratory insufficiency, when compared to conventional ventilators, the Trilogy device achieves comparable breathing pattern (tidal volume, respiratory rate, minute ventilation), hemodynamics (heart rate), and subjective measures of breathing comfort (measured by modified Borg dyspnea scale).

Enrollment

11 patients

Sex

All

Ages

21 to 85 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age > 21 years of age; < 85 years of age
  2. Able to follow instructions
  3. Able to provide informed consent
  4. Considered clinically stable, with low flow oxygen requirements less than 15 LPM (or FIO2 less than 60 %) and PEEP no greater than 10 cm H2O.
  5. Requiring mechanical ventilation through nasal/facial mask,tracheostomy or endotracheal tube (ET Tube)

Exclusion criteria

  1. Clinically unstable, i.e.,

    1. Acute Respiratory Failure
    2. Participants with refractory hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg despite inotropic agents),
    3. Uncontrolled cardiac ischemia or arrhythmias,
    4. or as otherwise determined inappropriate for the study as determined by the investigator.
  2. Patients suffering from metastatic or terminal cancer and patients with do-not-resuscitate orders

  3. Pregnancy

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

11 participants in 2 patient groups

Trilogy
Experimental group
Description:
Trilogy Device
Treatment:
Device: Trilogy
Standard of Care
Active Comparator group
Description:
Participants prescribed ventilator
Treatment:
Device: Standard of Care

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems