Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The objective of this study (Part II) will be to compare the performance of the Trilogy device and a conventional ventilator (participant's current device). Both devices will be set to the participants' current mode and prescription settings.
Full description
A. Primary Hypothesis and end-point In patients with respiratory insufficiency, when compared to conventional ventilators, the Trilogy device achieves comparable level of gas exchange (measured as partial pressure of CO2 in arterial or venous blood)and SpO2 levels during various modes of ventilation.
B. Secondary Hypothesis and end-points In patients with respiratory insufficiency, when compared to conventional ventilators, the Trilogy device achieves comparable breathing pattern (tidal volume, respiratory rate, minute ventilation), hemodynamics (heart rate), and subjective measures of breathing comfort (measured by modified Borg dyspnea scale).
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Clinically unstable, i.e.,
Patients suffering from metastatic or terminal cancer and patients with do-not-resuscitate orders
Pregnancy
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
11 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal